Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Dent Mater. 2020 Sep 19;36(11):1407–1417. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.08.015

Table 1.

Description of materials used in the study.

Legend Material Mean Grain Size
(standard-
deviation)b
Cubic Content b Mean Flexural
Strength
(standard-
deviation)b
Fracture
Toughnessa
Mean
Translucency
Parameter
(standard-
deviation)b
Clinical Indication a
MULTI IPS e.max ZirCAD Multi (Ivoclar Vivadent) Enamel layer: 1.87 (0.35) μm
T1: 1.72 (0.32) μm
T2: 1.40 (0.15) μm
Dentin Layer: 1.12 (0.21) μm
Enamel layer: 80 wt.%
T1: 64 wt.%
T2: 49 wt.%
Dentin Layer: 46 wt.%
Enamel layer: 387 (60) MPa


Dentin layer: 744 (104) MPa
3.6 MPa·m1/2 Enamel layer 36.7 (1.7)


Dentin layer 29.0 (0.7)
Full-contour crowns, full-contour 3-unit bridges, implant-supported superstructures
3Y IPS e.max ZirCAD LT (Ivoclar Vivadent) 1.08 (0.23) μm 15 wt.% 851 (97) MPa 5.0 MPa·m1/2 26.3 (0.0) Full-contour crowns, full-contour 3- and 4-unit to multi-unit bridges, frameworks, implant-supported superstructure
a

Information from manufacturer’s data sheets.

b

Measured in the author’s laboratory.