Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 4;12:629870. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.629870

Table 3.

Overview of the diffusion-weighted imaging studies examining corpus callosum abnormities in ASD patients.

References Autism Control Method Conclusion
N (F) Age VIQ PIQ FIQ N (F) Age VIQ PIQ FIQ FA MD RD AD
Alexander et al. (49) 43 (0) 16.23 (6.70) / 107.49 (13.04) / 34 (0) 16.44 (5.97) / 112.79 (12.08) / ROI N.S.
Ameis et al. (50) 71 (15) 11.40 (3.40) / / 95.0 (19.7) 62 (25) 10.80 (2.80) / / 112.5 (17.1) TBSS N.S. N.S. N.S.
Aoki et al. (51) 567 (81) 14.23 (/) / / 106.42 (/) 482 (116) 15.47 (/) / / 111.94 (/) Meta / /
Aoki et al. (52) 69 (7) 8.90 (1.70) 108 (16) 110 (19) 109 (17) 50 (12) 9.40 (1.50) 114 (15) 114 (14) 114 (13) TBSS
Barnea-Goraly et al. (53) 7 (0) 14.60 (3.40) 84 (17) 121.5 (8) 101 (12.2) 9 (0) 13.40 (2.80) 105.2 (11.4) 107 (10) 107 (8.5) Voxel based whole brain / / /
Barnea-Goraly et al. (54) 13 (2) 10.50 (2.00) / / 85.9 (17.4) 11 (2) 9.60 (2.10) / / 119.9 (13.3) TBSS / N.S.
Bashat et al. (55) 17 (/) 1.8–3.3 / / / 41 (18) 0.25–23 / / / ROI / / /
Brito et al. (56) 8 (0) 9.53 (1.83) / / / 8 (0) 9.57 (1.36) / / / ROI / / /
Di et al. (57) 297 (28) 22.40 (/) / / 107.87 (/) 302 (30) 22.2 (/) / / 112.50 (/) Meta / / /
Groen et al. (58) 17 (3) 14.40 (1.60) 97 (19) 100 (15) 98 (18) 25 (3) 15.50 (1.80) 105 (10) 105 (11) 105 (9) Voxel based whole brain / /
Hong et al. (59) 18 (0) 8.69 (2.18) / / 105.22 (21.12) 16 (0) 9.81 (1.91) / / 106.13 (20.13) ROI N.S. / / /
Keller et al. (60) 34 (0) 18.90 (7.30) / / 102.0 (14.8) 31 (0) 18.90 (6.20) / / 109.5 (9.0) Voxel based whole brain / / /
Kumar et al. (61) 32 (3) 5.00 (/) / / / 16 (4) 5.50 (/) / / / TBSS / / /
Nickel et al. (62) 30 (11) 35.40 (9.07) / / 124.5 (12.26) 30 (11) 35.53 (8.30) / / 123.63 (13.80) Voxel based whole brain N.S. / /
Noriuchi et al. (63) 7 (1) 13.96 (2.68) 93.7 (7.41) 93.14 (8.07) 92.71 (6.68) 7 (1) 13.36 (2.74) / / 116.43 (9.50) Voxel based whole brain / / /
Shukla et al. (64) 26 (2) 12.70 (0.60) 105.6 (3.6) 109.5 (3.3) / 24 (1) 13.00 (0.60) 108.2 (2.6) 110.3 (2.5) / ROI N.S
Shukla et al. (65) 26 (1) 12.80 (0.60) 104.3 (3.4) 108.8 (3.3) / 24 (1) 13.00 (0.60) 108.2 (2.6) 110.3 (2.5) / TBSS N.S.
Thomas et al. (66) 12 (0) 28.50 (9.70) 105.08 (10.09) 107.25 (13.9) 106.92 (10.47) 18(0) 22.40 (4.10) 109.8 (12.54) 111 (10.03) 111.6 (9.91) ROI N.S. / / /
Travers et al. (67) 100 (0) 18.30 (8.50) 96.3 (21.1) 102.6 (17.9) 100.1 (17.6) 56 (0) 18.90 (7.80) 114.7 (13.2) 116.3 (14.8) 118.2 (13.2) ROI
Vogan et al. (68) 61 (10) 10.90 (2.00) / / 102.2 (14.9) 69 (18) 11.10 (2.40) / / 112.7 (11.6) TBSS N.S. N.S.
Walker et al. (69) 39 (11) 4.63 (1.76) / / / 39 (13) 4.74 (1.76) / / / TBSS
Weinstein et al. (70) 22 (/) 3.20 (1.10) / / / 32 (/) 3.40 (1.30) / / / TBSS N.S. N.S.

For age and IQs, mean and standard deviation are reported. N (F): Number of subjects and female subjects; VIQ, Verbal IQ; PIQ, Performance IQ; FIQ, Full IQ; TBSS, Tract based spatial statistics; ROI, Region of interest; FA, Fractional anisotropy; MD, Mean diffusivity; RD, Radial diffusivity; AD, Axial diffusivity; ↑ or ↓, Increased or decreased in autism subjects compared to typically developing subjects; N.S, No significant group difference.