Table 5.
Invariance analysis for CBD monofactorial model.
| Invariance level | χ2 | df | p | CFI | ΔCFI | TLI | RMSEA | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Configural invariance | 398.64 | 378 | .223 | .998 | --- | .998 | .011 | 
| Weak invariance | 464.97 | 398 | .011 | .994 | .004 | .994 | .019 | 
| Strong invariance | 503.19 | 418 | .003 | .993 | .001 | .993 | .021 | 
| Strict invariance | 530.56 | 439 | .002 | .992 | .001 | .993 | .021 | 
Note. χ2 = chi square; df = degrees of freedom; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation. We used the monofactorial model, where all the items saturated in only one factor.