Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 18;76(7):550.e1–550.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.02.029

Table 2.

Sensitivity, specificity, PPV∗, NPV∗ and AUROC of CT in the diagnosis of oesophageal variceal grading.

CT grading No varices Small Medium Large
Sensitivity
95% CI
66.6%
22.3–95.7
79.3%
60.3–92
89.6%
72.7–97.8
94.1%
80.3–99.3
Specificity
95% CI
96.9%
91.3–99.4
94.6%
86.9–98.5
86.6%
76.8–93.4
88.5%
78.7–94.9
PPV∗
95% CI
57.1%
27.7–82.3
85.1%
68.5–93.8
72.2%
59–82.4
80%
67.5–88.5
NPV∗
95% CI
97.9%
93.9–99.3
92.2%
85.3–96
95.5%
88.1–98.5
96.8%
89–99.2
AUROC
95% CI
0.775
0.54–1
0.887
0.80–0.97
0.839
0.75–0.93
0.913
0.85–0.98
p-Value 0.015 0.00 0.00 0.00

PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; AUROC, area under the receiver operating curve.