Table 2.
Comparative analysis; new OT-positions.
| Yes (n = 96) | No (n = 240) | Missing (n = 225) | Comparative analysis | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | % | N | % | N | % | χ2 (df/p<) | ||
| Region | North | 8 | 8.3 | 23 | 9.6 | 29 | 12.9 | |
| Middle | 7 | 7.3 | 35 | 14.6 | 34 | 15.1 | ||
| West | 16 | 16.7 | 48 | 20 | 43 | 19.1 | ||
| South | 15 | 15.6 | 44 | 18.3 | 10 | 4.4 | ||
| East | 13 | 13.5 | 46 | 19.2 | 28 | 12.4 | 44,785 | |
| South-East | 37 | 38.5 | 44 | 18.3 | 81 | 36.0 | (10/.001) | |
| Size of municipality | <2.000 | 29 | 30.2 | 130 | 54.2 | 48 | 21.3 | |
| 2.000- 19.999 | 52 | 54.2 | 76 | 31.7 | 107 | 47.6 | 63,922 | |
| >20.000 | 15 | 15.6 | 34 | 14.2 | 70 | 31.1 | (4/.001) | |
| Co-placement with other OTs (% yes) | 76 | 79.2 | 139 | 57.9 | 161 | 71.6 | 17.501 (2/.001) | |
| OT in leading position | 29 | 30.2 | 31 | 12.9 | 68 | 30.2 | 23.342 (2/.001) | |
| Participant in leading position | 6 | 6.3 | 18 | 7.5 | 12 | 5.3 | n.s. | |
| Merged (% yes) | 37 | 38.5 | 51 | 21.3 | 69 | 30.7 | 11.513 (2/.01) | |
| Number of OT’s in same unit (mean, std) | 10.57 (10.6) | 4.95 (5.34) | 13.75 (17.32) | |||||