Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):e043628. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043628

Table 4.

Prospective published studies of local consolidative therapy in OM NSCLC

Author Study design Patients (n) Sites (n) Intervention Med FU (months) Inclusion Median outcomes in months
Gomez et al19
(NSCLC)
RCT-II
CRT arm
No CRT
25
24
≤3 LCT+MT vs MT/O alone 38.8 Synchronous* PFS 14.4 vs 4.4
OS 41.2 vs 17
Iyengar et al20
(NSCLC)
RCT-II 14
15
≤5 SABR+MT vs MT alone 9.6 Synchronous PFS 9.7 vs 3.5
Palma et al31
(various primaries)
RCT-II 66
33
≤5 SABR+SOC vs SOC alone 26 Synchronous or metachronous OS 41 vs 28
Sutera et al29
(various primaries)
Phase II 147
(lung-32)
≤5 SABR 41.3 Synchronous or metachronous OS 42.3
(lung OS—26.8)
De Ruysscher et al32 (NSCLC) Phase II 40 ≤5 SABR 27.7 Synchronous OS—13.5
Petty et al30 (NSCLC) Phase II 29 ≤5 SBRT 24.2 Synchronous OS—28.4
PFS—11.2
Collen et al33 (NSCLC) Phase II 26 ≤5 SBRT 16.4 OS—23
PFS—11.2
Arrieta et al34 (NSCLC) Phase II 37 ≤5 RCT 32.5 Synchronous* OS—not reached
PFS—23.5

*Includes oncogene mutation-positive patients.

LAT, local ablative therapy; LCRT, local consolidation radiation therapy; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; OM, oligometastases; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; RCT, randomised controlled trial; SABR, stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; SBRT, stereotactic body radiation therapy; SMT, standard maintenance therapy; SOC, standard of care; TNBC, triple-negative breast cancer.