Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 25;78(7):619–632. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab010

Table 3.

General Characteristics of Tools Focusing on Medication Adherence

Tool Primary Study
(Year Published)
Systematic Review and Monthsdified Evidence GRADE Primary Study Characteristics Study Measurement Methods Results
Setting (Country) Follow-up Duration Patient Population Who Used Tool? No. Subjects (I/C) Data Source Outcome Variable
Interventions Focused on Medication Adherence in General
1. Telephone reminder timeline with 4 parts: medication reconciliation and tailoring + patient education + collaborative care between pharmacist and PCP and/or cardiologist + voice messaging Lambert-Kerzner et al (2012)8 van Driel et al (2016)
Moderate
Postdischarge
(United States)
12 months Adults with acute coronary syndrome Pharmacist 140/140 Pharmacy refill data on cardioprotective medications Modified medication possession ratio for each medication (no. days medication supplied/observation time interval) Significantly better adherence to medication regimens in intervention group vs control group (89.3% vs 73.9%, P = 0.003)
2. Telephone reminder script: automated call from provider organization that prompted patient to get newly prescribed statin 1–2 weeks after visit (if medication not picked up within 1 weeks of call, a letter was sent) Derose et al (2013)9 van Driel et al (2016)
Moderate
Postdischarge
(United States)
25 days Adults with dyslipidemia Provider organization 2,606/2,610 Medication dispensations from healthcare pharmacies Dispensation of statin between first phone call and up to 2 weeks after letter was delivered (25 days) Significantly better postdischarge statin dispensation in intervention group vs control group (42.3% vs 26.0%; absolute difference, 16.3%; P < 0.001)
Interventions Focused on Medication Adherence for Patients with Comonthsrbid Depression
3. Flowchart for managing depression and hypertension: in-person and telephone conversations discussing depression and effect on antihypertensive medication adherence Bogner et al (2008)10,a Viswanathan et al (2012)
Low
Outpatient
(United States)
6 weeks Adults 50-80 years of age with HTN and depression Integrated care manager 32/32 MEMS caps Adherence: 80% or more of pills taken during specified observation period Significantly better adherence to antidepressant medication (71.9% vs 31.3%, P < 0.01) and antihypertensive medication (78.1% vs 31.3%, P < 0.001) in intervention group vs control group
Interventions Addressing Medication Adherence with Communication or Patient Education
4. Pharmacist-delivered adherence monitoring service: BMQ/MARS/BMU questionnaires + SF12 quality of life questionnaire + 21 food frequency checklist and exercise survey Aslani et al (2010)12 Rash et al (2016)
Very low
Outpatient
(Australia)
12 months Adults with dyslipidemia Pharmacist 48/49 MARS MARS At the second study visit, 3 months after the initial visit, patients were less likely to take a decreased amount of the prescribed dose (F2,178 = 4.3, P < 0.05; contrast F1,89 = 5.7, P < 0.05)
5. Motivational interviewing script: 4 motivational interview sessions every 3 months for 12 months Ogedegbe et al (2008)13
Primary study
Easthall et al (2013)
Very low
Outpatient
(United States)
12 months African American adults with HTN Research assistant 95/95 MEMS caps Taking adherence: proportion of days in which the patient took the prescribed medication Significantly better posttreatment adherence rates in intervention group vs control group (57% vs 43%, P = 0.027)
6. Pharmacist patient education protocol: baseline medication history with patient-centered verbal/written instructions + collaborative care with PCP and/or nurse Murray et al (2007)14 Demonceau et al (2013)
Very low
Outpatient
(United States)
12 months Low-income adults ≥50 years of age with heart failure Pharmacist 122/192 MEMS caps Adherence: % of prescribed medication taken Overall medication adherence was significantly better in intervention group vs control (78.8% vs 67.9%; absolute difference, 10.9%; 95% CI, 5.0-16.7)
Interventions Addressing Medication Adherence with SMS Text Messages
7. SMS text message scripts for asthma: SMS text messages that were tailored to each patient based on BIPQ responses at baseline Petrie et al (2012)15 Tao et al (2015)
Low
Outpatient
(New Zealand)
9 mo Adults and adolescents (16-45 years of age) with asthma A bank of 166 text messages tailored for asthmatic patients 73/74 Self-report BIPQ
Adherence: 80% or greater of taking medication
Significant improvement in SMS group in perception of medication necessity, nature of patient’s asthma, and patient’s control of asthma (P < 0.05); significantly higher percentage of SMS group vs control group took 80% of their inhaler doses (37.7% vs 23.9%, P < 0.05)
8. SMS text message scripts for type 1 diabetes: SweetTalk Software System (motivational SMS text messages) Franklin et al (2006)16 Tao et al (2015)
Low
Outpatient
(United Kingdom)
12 months Pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes Automated system with over 400 text messages 33/28 Self-report Visual analogue adherence score Significantly better adherence in the intervention group vs control group (mean [SD], 77.2 [16.1] vs 70.4 [20.0], P = 0.042)
Interventions Addressing Medication Adherence with Communication or Patient Education
9. Pharmacist-delivered adherence monitoring service: BMQ/MARS/BMU questionnaires + SF12 quality of life questionnaire + 21 food frequency checklist and exercise survey Aslani et al (2010)12 Rash et al (2016)
Very low
Outpatient
(Australia)
12 months Adults with dyslipidemia Pharmacist 48/49 MARS MARS At second study visit, which occurred 3 mo after the initial visit, patients were less likely to take a decreased amount of the prescribed dose (F2,178 = 4.3, P < 0.05; contrast F1,89 = 5.7, P < 0.05)
10. Motivational interviewing script: 4 motivational interview sessions every 3 mo for 12 mo Ogedegbe et al (2008)13
Primary study
Easthall et al (2013)
Very low
Outpatient
(United States)
12 months African-American adults with HTN Research assistant 95/95 MEMS caps Taking adherence (proportion of days on which the patient took the prescribed medication) Significantly better posttreatment adherence rates in intervention group vs control group (57% vs 43%, P = 0.027)
11. Pharmacist patient education protocol: baseline medication history with patient-centered verbal/written instructions + collaborative care with PCP/nurse Murray et al (2007)14 Demonceau et al (2013)
Very low
Outpatient
(United States)
12 months Low-income adults age ≥50 years with heart failure Pharmacist 122/192 MEMS caps Adherence (percentage of prescribed medication taken) Overall medication adherence was significantly better in intervention group vs control group (78.8% vs 67.9%; absolute difference, 10.9%; 95% CI, 5.0-16.7)
Interventions Addressing Medication Adherence with SMS Text Messages
12. SMS text message scripts for asthma: SMS text messages that were tailored to each patient based on BIPQ responses at baseline Petrie et al (2012)15 Tao et al (2015)
Low
Outpatient
(New Zealand)
9 months Adults and adolescents (16-45 years of age) with asthma A bank of 166 text messages tailored for asthmatic patients 73/74 Self-report BIPQ
Adherence: 80% or greater of taking medication
Significant improvement in SMS group in perception of medication necessity, nature of patient’s asthma, and patient’s control of asthma (P < 0.05); significantly higher percentage of SMS group vs control group took 80% of their inhaler doses (37.7% vs 23.9%, P < 0.05)
13. SMS text message scripts for type 1 diabetes: SweetTalk Software System (motivational SMS text messages) Franklin et al (2006)16 Tao et al (2015)
Low
Outpatient
(United Kingdom)
12 months Pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes Automated system with over 400 text messages 33/28 Self-report Visual analogue adherence score Significantly better adherence in the intervention group vs control group (mean [SD], 77.2 [16.1] vs 70.4 [20.0], P = 0.042)

Abbreviations: BIPQ, Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire; BMQ, Brief Medication Questionnaire; BMU, Barriers to Medication Use Questionnaire; CI, confidence interval; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation5; MARS, Medication Adherence Report Scale; MEMS, Medication Event Monitoring System; PCP = primary care provider; SD, standard deviation; SF12, 12-item Short Form Survey; SMS, short message service.

aIntervention methods also discussed in reference 11.