Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 22;36(4):965–975. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa377

Table III.

Multivariate logistical regression analysis of DEGO degree and other covariates (excluding AFS score).

Variables Category Estimate SE χ2* P-value Odds ratio 95% confidence interval
Test cohort
Intercept 3.3705 1.2008 7.8786 0.005 / /
Age −0.0849 0.0278 9.3622 0.0022 0.919 0.87–0.97
Gravidity 2 0.7324 0.354 4.2788 0.0386 2.08 1.039–4.163
≥3 0.6298 0.3135 4.0345 0.0446 1.877 1.015–3.471
Visibility of fallopian tube ostia Unilateral invisible 0.2791 0.86 0.1053 0.7456 1.322 0.245–7.133
Bilateral visible 1.3508 0.654 4.266 0.0389 3.86 1.071–13.909
DEGO G1 −1.4932 0.6273 5.6653 0.0173 0.225 0.066–0.768
G2 −3.5891 0.6403 31.4194 <0.0001 0.028 0.008–0.097
G3 −4.7467 0.8143 33.9816 <0.0001 0.009 0.002–0.043
Validation cohort
Intercept 2.7356 1.3021 4.4141 0.0356 / /
Age −0.0441 0.0339 1.695 0.1929 0.957 0.895–1.023
Gravidity 2 0.4683 0.4219 1.2319 0.267 1.597 0.699–3.652
≥3 0.2055 0.394 0.272 0.602 1.228 0.567–2.658
Visibility of fallopian tube ostia Unilateral invisible 0.5001 0.808 0.3831 0.5359 1.649 0.338–8.034
Bilateral visible 0.401 0.5634 0.5066 0.4766 1.493 0.495–4.506
DEGO degree G1 −1.3449 0.6652 4.0872 0.0432 0.261 0.071–0.96
G2 −3.441 0.6819 25.4664 <0.0001 0.032 0.008–0.122
G3 −4.3012 0.8331 26.6538 <0.0001 0.014 0.003–0.069
*

χ2 test for entire group.