Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 16;11:6006. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85570-2

Figure 4.

Figure 4

GradCAM-based heatmaps for the developed model. Each sub-figure shows input image and its label on the left side and GradCAM and prediction probability on the right side. (a) and (b) show PA and LAT views of a true positive case from test set #1 where the fracture is easily visible. (c) and (d) show both views of a true positive from test set #2 where the fracture is hardly visible and (e) and (f) show both views of a false negative case from test set #2 where the pipeline predicts them as normal.