Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 18.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Dec 3;132(2):586–597. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.030

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Results for subject S2. Top left: the volume of interest (in red) as marked by the neurosurgeon on the T1 image, overlaid with the wrinkled cortex. Top row, second, third and fourth columns show the solutions obtained with sLORETA, MSP and cMEM respectively, where the selected patches based on the best artificial versus real EEG match are highlighted in green. Bottom left: the interpolated real EEG on the scalp at the time point of interest. Bottom row, second, third and fourth columns show the artificial EEG modeled by placing dipoles centered at the patches marked in green in the top row for sLORETA, MSP and cMEM, respectively. Methods: standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA), multiple sparse priors (MSP) and coherent maximum entropy on the mean (cMEM). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)