Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inverse Probl. 2020 Feb 26;36(4):045006. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/ab649c

Table 4.2:

Quantitative results for the 1D constant coefficients test-case using the two-norm regularized solver (L2) and the compressive sampling (CS) solver. The ground truth forward solver parameters are indicated by ‘ ’ and their respective reconstructed coefficient values by ‘rec’. We use a spatial discretization of 2π/256 with 256 grid points and a time discretization of 0.01 with 100 time steps. We consider the ground truth for the model constants as ρ = 10, κ = 0.05 to ensure a large tumor (larger tumors correspond to larger time horizons which make inverting for initial conditions hard). We report the relative error in inverted coefficient values (eκ, eρ), the relative error in final tumor reconstruction (μT,L2), the relative error in the reconstructed initial condition (μ0,L2), the relative error in the parameterization of the initial condition (μp,l1), the relative change in the gradient (∥g∥rel) and solver timings (Tinv) in seconds.

Test case Solver k* p* Krec eK prec eP μT,L2 μ0,L2 μp,<1 ||g||rel Tinv [s]
1D-C1 L2 5E-2 1E1 1.03E-2 7.95E-1 1.05E0 8.69E-1 1.22E-3 3.95E0 1.43E1 6.69E-4 7.02E0
CS 5E-2 1E1 4.76E-2 4.77E-2 9.41E0 5.89E-2 1.91E-4 6.49E-1 2.10E0 3.14E-6 9.05E0

1D-C2 L2 5E-2 1E1 1.71E-2 6.58E-1 1.20E0 8.50E-1 1.57E-3 3.84E0 1.19E1 4.34E-5 8.13E0
CS 5E-2 1E1 5.07E-2 1.33E-2 1.09E1 9.41E-2 5.09E-2 8.80E-1 1.64E0 2.94E-6 1.17E1