Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inverse Probl. 2020 Feb 26;36(4):045006. doi: 10.1088/1361-6420/ab649c

Table 4.3:

Quantitative results for the artificial tumor test-case in which we compare the L2 solver and the CSsolver. The ground truth forward solver parameters are indicated by ‘ ’ and their respective reconstructed values by ‘rec’. We also report the relative error in the inverted coefficient values (eκ, eρ), the relative error in the final tumor reconstruction (μT,L2), the relative error in the reconstructed initial condition (μ0,L2), the relative error in the parameterization of the initial condition (μp,𝓁1), the relative change in the gradient (∥g∥rel) and solver timings (Tinv) in seconds. All simulations were run using 64 MPI tasks on 3 nodes of the Skylake partition of the Stampede2 system at TACC.

Test case Solver κ* ρ* κrec eK ρrec ep μT,L2 μ0,L2 μp,l1 grel Tinv [s]
AT-C1 L2 2.50E-2 8E0 2.32E-2 7.17E-2 4.08E0 4.90E-1 3.13E-1 2.92E0 9.13E0 4.02E-3 2.31E2
CS 2.50E-2 8E0 2.50E-2 9.52E-4 8.01E0 6.99E-4 2.71E-4 1.24E-4 2.50E-2 1.75E-7 8.42E2

AT-C2 L2 5E-2 1.20E1 2.13E-2 5.73E-1 4.13E0 6.56E-1 1.58E-1 5.66E0 2.35E1 7.39E-3 2.38E2
CS 5E-2 1.20E1 3.89E-2 2.23E-1 1.02E1 1.47E-1 1.72E-1 1.26E0 2.25E0 9.36E-6 6.43E2

AT-C3 L2 2.50E-2 1E1 1.36E-2 4.57E-1 4.62E0 5.38E-1 1.84E-1 3.55E0 1.09E1 3.16E-4 3.21E2
CS 2.50E-2 1E1 2.67E-2 6.84E-2 9.91E0 8.60E-3 1.40E-1 6.92E-1 5.35E-1 2.08E-6 9.47E2

AT-C4 L2 2.50E-2 8E0 1.57E-2 3.73E-1 3.95E0 5.06E-1 2.34E-1 2.42E0 8.23E0 2.64E-3 2.31E2
CS 2.50E-2 8E0 2.57E-2 2.64E-2 7.31E0 8.66E-2 2.92E-1 1.13E0 2.01E0 5.31E-6 1.41E3