Table 3.

Integrated understanding of trust and suspicion, simplified and adjusted for the purpose of this paper after Lewicki et al. [155]

	Low levels of suspicion	High levels of suspicion
High levels of trust	Trust by normative congruence Poor incentive for monitoring and control Prone to emotional and ideological manipulation	Trust by verification High incentive for continuous monitoring and control Possibly prone to data manipulation, unless data quality is also monitored and controlled
Low levels of trust	Limited interdependence Poor incentive for monitoring and control	Harmful motives assumed and potential paranoia and conspiracy theories Monitoring and control is disbelieved Believe in ideology or “pathos” and “ethos” and disbelieve in data or “logos” is common Prone to emotional and ideological manipulation