Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 18;11:6203. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85593-9

Table 1.

Comparison of clinicopathologic features between NECs and ACs after matching tumour site.

30 NECs 100 ACs p value
Number (%) Number (%)
Age (years), median (range) 67 (44–83) 62 (33–81) 0.07
Sex
Male 20 (67) 57 (57) 0.4011
Female 10 (33) 43 (43)
Underlying disease
HNPCC 1 (3) 0
FAP 1 (3) 0
Tumor location
Right-sided 9 (30) 30 (30)
Left-sided 7 (23) 23 (23)
Rectum 14 (47) 47 (47)
Tumor size (cm), median (range) 5.65 (1.6–16) 5.4 (0.5–15) 0.1535
Tumor differentiation
Low grade 89
High grade 30 11
Histologic subtype
Small cell 12 (40)
Large cell 18 (60)
Mitoses/2 mm2, median (range) 62.5 (12–141)
Ki-67 index(%), median (range) 75 (50–95)
Coexisting component
Adenocarcinoma 7 (23)
Tubular adenoma 3 (10)
Depth of invasion
T1 1 (3) 6 (6) 0.1247
T2 4 (13) 12 (12)
T3 19 (63) 76 (76)
T4 6 (20) 6 (6)
Lymphatic invasion
No 1 (3) 59 (59)  < 0.0001
Yes 29 (97) 41 (41)
Vascular invasion
No 7 (23) 80 (80)  < 0.0001
Yes 23 (77) 20 (20)
N category
N0 6 (20) 47 (47) 0.0001
N1 6 (20) 33 (33)
N2 18 (60) 20 (20)
M category
M0 9 (30) 91 (91) 0.0001
M1 11 (37) 14 (14)
Metastatic sites
Liver 6 (20) 7 (7)  > 0.9999
Others 5 (17) 7 (7)
Pathologic AJCC stage
I/II 5 (17) 45 (45) 0.0053
III/IV 25 (83) 55 (55)

HNPCC hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, FAP familial adenomatous polyposis.