Skip to main content
. 2005 Jan;26(1):89–92.

TABLE 1:

Comparison of basal angle measurements with standard radiographic and standard MR imaging techniques

Author Technique Mean Maximum Minimum 95% Confidence Limit*
Brailsford7 Radiography 135° 149° 121° Not applicable
McGregor2 (n = 203) Radiography 134° 148° 121° 141°, 127°
Poppel et al3 (n = 102) Radiography 137° 152° 123° 147°, 127°
Present series
    Adults MR imaging 129° ± 6° 143° 113° 130°, 128°
    Children MR imaging 127° ± 5° 136° 114° 128°, 126°

Note.—Measurements are provided to nearest whole unit.

*

Upper and lower 95% confidence limits for radiographic series are estimated on the basis of standard deviations and sample size.