Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;9(3):2325967121989678. doi: 10.1177/2325967121989678

Table 2.

Study Features a

Lead Author Year Study Design LOE MINORS Functional Score Radiographic Evaluation Second-Look Arthroscopy
Ahn 2 2010 Case series 4 8/16 Lysholm, IKDC Yes Yes
Anderson 3 2010 Case series 4 10/16 Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner Yes Yes
Song 27 2014 Case series 4 11/16 Lysholm, Tegner No Yes
Zhuo 32 2020 Case series 4 10/16 Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner Yes Yes
Tsujii 30 2019 Cohort study b 3 19/24 None Yes Yes
LaPrade 13 2017 Cohort study c 3 16/24 Lysholm, Tegner, WOMAC, SF-12 No No
Krych 10 2020 Cohort study c 3 18/24 Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner No No
Okazaki 18 2020 Cohort study d 3 17/24 IKDC Yes No
Pan 20 2015 Cohort study e 3 18/24 Lysholm, IKDC Yes No

a IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; LOE, level of evidence; MINORS, Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies; SF-12, 12-Item Short Form Health Survey; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

b This study compared the results of patients undergoing surgical repairs for lateral meniscus posterior root tears and patients without meniscal tears.

c This study compared the results of surgical repairs treating posterior root tears of the lateral and medial meniscus.

d This study compared the results of tears of the lateral meniscus posterior root treated by different repair techniques.

e This study compared the results of tears of the lateral meniscus posterior root treated by surgical repairs and left in situ.