Table 2.
Evaluation of students’ performance after 6 months from the administration of the video lesson.
| T0 | T1 | |||||
| n = 44 | n = 34 | |||||
| Performance | n | % | n | % | Δ | p |
| n. 1 | 35 | 79.5 | 22 | 64.7 | -14.8 | .143 |
| n. 2 | 42 | 95.5 | 32 | 94.1 | -1.4 | .791 |
| n. 3 | 43 | 97.7 | 30 | 88.2 | -9.5 | .090 |
| n. 4 | 36 | 81.8 | 15 | 44.1 | -37.7 | .001** |
| n. 5 | 39 | 88.6 | 1 | 2.9 | -85.7 | .000** |
| n. 6 | 42 | 95.5 | 30 | 88.2 | -7.3 | .235 |
* p = < .05; ** p = < .01