Skip to main content
. 2021 Feb 4;92(1):e2021030. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i1.8891

Table 2.

Distribution of study population based on Simplified-Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S), Community Periodontal Index (CPI) and Loss of Attachment (LOA) coding criteria

Variables n (%) Total
Cases Controls p-value
DI-S Good 62 (7.7) 227 (28.1) 0.0001* 289 (17.9)
Fair 533 (65.9) 536 (66.3) 1069 (66.1)
Poor 213 (26.4) 45 (5.6) 258 (16)
CI-S Good 24 (2.9) 110 (13.6) 0.0001* 134 (8.3)
Fair 167 (20.7) 363 (44.9) 530 (32.8)
Poor 617 (76.4) 335 (41.5) 952 (58.9)
OHI-S Good 15 (1.9) 96 (11.9) 0.0001* 111 (6.9)
Fair 183 (22.6) 417 (51.6) 600 (37.1)
Poor 610 (75.5) 295 (36.5) 905 (56)
CPI Code 0 0 (0) 0 (0) 0.0001* 0 (0)
Code 1 2 (0.2) 10 (1.2) 12 (0.7)
Code 2 39 (4.8) 205 (25.4) 244 (15.1)
Code 3 170 (21.1) 390 (48.3) 560 (34.7)
Code 4 597 (73.9) 203 (25.1) 800 (49.5)
Code X 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Code 9 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
LOA Code 0 126 (15.6) 424 (52.5) 0.0001* 550 (34)
Code 1 194 (24) 295 (36.5) 489 (30.3)
Code 2 236 (29.2) 59 (7.3) 295 (18.2)
Code 3 202 (25) 24 (3) 226 (14)
Code 4 50 (6.2) 6 (0.7) 56 (3.5)
Code X 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
Code 9 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)

*statistically significant (p≤0.05); n=number of people

DI-S- Debris Index- Simplified; CI-S- Calculus Index-Simplified; OHI-S- Simplified- Oral Hygiene Index

CPI- Community Periodontal Index; LOA-Loss of Attachment