Table 6.
Regression analysis using implicit avoidant attachment and explicit dismissive attachment as independent variables and well-being total score and well-being subscales as criterion variable.
| STEP 1 | STEP 2 | STEP 3 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VARIABLE | B(SE) | ß | B(SE) | ß | B(SE) | ß |
| TOTAL WELL-BEING | R2 = .04 | R2 = .05 ΔR2 = .00 | R2 = .09 ΔR2 = .05* | |||
| Gender1 | –.23(.19) | –.12 | –.25 (.20) | –.13 | –.26 (.19) | –.13 |
| Age | .14 (.10) | .14 | .16 (.11) | .15 | .16 (.10) | .15 |
| Education2 | –.05 (.07) | –.06 | –.05 (.07) | –.07 | –.02 (.07) | –.03 |
| RQ Dism3 | –.06 (.10) | –.06 | –.07 (.10) | –.08 | ||
| AVOID IAT | –.22 (.10) | –.22* | ||||
| Emotional well-being: | R2 = .03 | R2 = .03 ΔR2 = .00 | R2 = .10 ΔR2 = .07** | |||
| Gender1 | –.17 (.19) | –.09 | –.16 (.20) | –.08 | –.17 (.19) | –.09 |
| Age | .09 (.10) | .09 | .08 (.11) | .08 | .08 (.10) | .08 |
| Education2 | –.08 (.07) | –.12 | –.08 (.07) | –.12 | –.05 (.07) | –.08 |
| RQ Dism3 | .03 (.10) | .03 | .02 (.10) | .02 | ||
| AVOID IAT | –.27 (.10) | –.26** | ||||
| Social well-being: | R2 = .05 | R2 = .05 ΔR2 = .00 | R2 = .06 ΔR2 = .01 | |||
| Gender1 | –.15 (.19) | –.08 | –.16 (.19) | –.08 | –.17 (.19) | –.09 |
| Age | .21 (.10) | .20* | .22 (.11) | .21* | .22 (.11) | .21* |
| Education2 | –.02 (.07) | –.03 | –.02 (.07) | –.03 | –.01 (.07) | –.01 |
| RQ Dism3 | –.05 (.10) | –.05 | –.06 (.10) | –.06 | ||
| AVOID IAT | –.11 (.10) | –.10 | ||||
| Psychological well-being: | R2 = .03 | R2 = .04 ΔR2 = .01 | R2 = .10 ΔR2 = .06* | |||
| Gender1 | –.26 (.19) | –.14 | –.29 (.19) | –.15 | –.30 (.19) | –.16 |
| Age | .10 (.10) | .10 | .12 (.10) | .11 | .12 (.10) | .11 |
| Education2 | –.03 (.07) | –.05 | –.04 (.07) | –.05 | –.01 (.07) | –.01 |
| RQ Dism3 | –.09 (.10) | –.09 | –.10 (.09) | –.11 | ||
| AVOID IAT | –.25 (.10) | –.24* | ||||
* p < .05; ** p < .01.
1 1 = male, 2 = female.
2 Ranging from 1 = first stage of basic education, to 8 = Master’s degree.
3 Relationship Questionnaire Dismissive Attachment.