Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr;26(4):743–749.

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Comparison of 3DPC (A, B) with a PCVIPR (C, D) acquisition having an acceleration factor of 17. In this case, comparable imaging times were used and the acceleration is due to a factor of 2.5 in volume coverage and a factor of 7 reduction in voxel volume. No pulsatile artifact appears on the PCVIPR image (C) as it does on the 3DPC image (A, arrows).