Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 10;2021:6630598. doi: 10.1155/2021/6630598

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of literatures.

Publication Sample size Proportion of male (%) Age mean ± SD/range Diagnose Therapeutic course Outcome ROB
TCM CG TCM CG
Wenzhong Zhang, 2013 30 20 86.00% 6-14 CCMD-III 6Ws ①⑤ U
Weibin Gao, 2007 60 60 71.66% 4-21 CCMD-2-R 3Ws ①②③④ U
Dahua Wu, 2007 22 22 75.00% 9.66 ± 2.83 10.03 ± 3.08 DSM-IV 4Ws ①②⑥ L
Guolan Ge, 2013 31 31 79.03% 6.08 ± 2.05 DSM-IV 12Ws H
Linghua Deng, 2014 30 30 70.00% 8.09 ± 1.74 8.47 ± 1.78 DSM-IV 8Ws ①②⑥ H
Congling Sun, 2008 33 33 78.79% 6-18 DSM-IV 24Ws ①③④⑥ L
Anyuan Li, 2008 60 60 71.67% 3-25 DSM-IV 24Ws ①③④⑦ L
Ruiping Ma, 2006 60 60 71.67% 10.26 ± 4.05 10.98 ± 3.80 DSM-IV 24Ws ①③④⑦ L
Anyuan Li, 2013 42 43 70.59% 10.48 ± 2.85 10.53 ± 2.78 DSM-IV 24Ws ①②③④⑥⑦ L
Riming Wu, 2004 30 30 78.33% 4-12 CCMD-2-R 8Ws ①⑦ U
Ying Tang, 2015 50 50 51.00% 8.60 ± 3.20 8.30 ± 3.40 Other 12Ws ①⑦ U
Hengping Chen, 2009 43 30 27.40% 9.20 ± 0.80 9.10 ± 0.90 CCMD-2-R 12Ws ①⑦ U
Guiping Li, 2013 54 54 53.70% 6.50 ± 3.30 7.20 ± 3.80 CCMD-2-R 8Ws ①② U
Xiubo Du, 2011 32 30 67.74% 7.92 ± 3.59 8.09 ± 3.43 DSM-IV 12Ws ①⑦ U
Yan Liu, 2009 60 40 58.00% 10.26 ± 4.05 10.98 ± 3.80 DSM-IV 24Ws ①③④⑦ U
Bo wang, 2013 48 48 71.88% 13.40 ± 4.20 12.90 ± 3.90 DSM-IV 12Ws ①② U
Lijun Deng, 2015 40 40 76.25% 9.14 ± 2.21 9.16 ± 2.19 DSM-IV 12Ws ①②⑥ L
Feifei Chen, 2011 30 30 56.67% 8.00 ± 2.36 9.00 ± 2.65 DSM-IV 12Ws ①② L
Tingting Fu, 2007 33 33 71.21% 7.97 ± 2.79 8.29 ± 2.73 DSM-IV 24Ws ①②③④⑥⑦ L
Feng Han, 2015 30 30 75.00% 8.94 ± 2.18 9.15 ± 2.27 DSM-IV-R 8Ws ①⑥ U
Huawei Li, 2011 36 36 45.83% 9.55 ± 2.91 9.20 ± 3.02 CCMD-III 8Ws ①②⑥ U
Rongyi Zhou, 2016 60 60 78.33% 5-15 5-16 Other 16Ws ①⑦ H
Siyuan Hu, 2014 328 110 80.37% 9.86 ± 2.92 9.35 ± 2.94 Other 4Ws ①②⑥⑦ L
Qi Sun, 2016 36 36 56.00% 4-35 Other 8Ws ①⑦ H
Lifeng Shi, 2009 30 30 70.00% 5-18 DSM-IV 8Ws ①⑦ H
Yi Zheng,2016 362 116 84.52% 9.60 ± 3.10 9.90 ± 2.80 DSM-IV 8Ws ①⑥⑦ L
Jinhui Li, 2016 118 115 54.35% 4-14 DSM-IV 6Ws ①②⑥ L
Xingyou Zhao, 2007 30 30 53.33% 4-18 DSM-IV 12Ws ①②③④⑥⑦ L
Na Yang, 2016 353 118 81.85% NR CCMD-III 6Ws ①②⑥⑦ L
Rong Ma, 2010 336 113 NR 4-18 DSM-IV 6Ws ①②③④⑦ H
Zheng Hong, 2015 43 42 84.71% 7.84 ± 1.79 8.31 ± 1.98 DSM-IV-R 12Ws ①②⑤⑥⑦ U
Meiying Liu, 2011 30 30 75.00% 8.17 ± 2.87 9.20 ± 3.16 DSM-IV-TR 8Ws ①②③④⑤⑥⑦ L
Jin Li, 2010 106 105 NR 4-18 CCMD-III 4Ws ①②③④⑤⑥⑦ L
Haiying Wei, 2013 30 30 78.33% 8.53 ± 2.49 8.33 ± 2.48 CCMD-III 8Ws ①②⑥⑦ U
Di Zhang, 2013 30 30 73.33% NR CCMD-III 6Ws ①②⑥⑦ U
Chuang Zhao, 2014 30 30 70.00% 8.57 ± 2.52 8.23 ± 2.45 Other 8Ws ①③④ U
L Zhao, 2010 33 31 89.06% 11.95 ± 2.93 12.50 ± 2.87 DSM-IV-TR 8Ws ①②③④ L
Anyuan Li, 2009 60 30 57.78% 9.59 ± 3.00 9.60 ± 2.95 DSM-IV 24Ws ①②③④⑤⑦ L
Min Wu, 2010 31 30 83.61% 8.61 ± 3.16 9.30 ± 2.32 ICD-10 24Ws ①② L
Min Wu, 2009 41 40 81.48% 9.70 ± 2.01 9.10 ± 1.13 DSM-IV 24Ws ①② L
Yunchou Wu,2015 32 32 70.31% 5-18 DSM-IV 6Ws ①⑥⑦ U
Feng Yang, 2012 30 30 61.67% 7.5 7.3 DSM-IV 4Ws ①⑤ H
Fen Wang, 2011 30 30 76.67% 4-12 Other 4Ws ①⑦ U
Xinhui Shan, 2016 45 45 81.11% 8.00 ± 2.5 9.00 ± 2.7 Other 12Ws ①②⑤⑦ U
Jiaomei Feng, 2011 33 33 71.21% 8.48 ± 2.50 8.18 ± 2.57 DSM-IV 12Ws ①②③④⑤⑥⑦ U
Jinping Fan, 2017 60 60 64.17% 10.33 ± 3.14 10.90 ± 3.54 DSM-V 12Ws ①②⑥⑦ U
Jingyu Qiu, 2010 60 40 58.00% 11.03 ± 4.05 11.09 ± 3.80 DSM-IV 24Ws ①③④⑦ U

CCMD: Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders; CG: control group; DSM: the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual; H: high; L: Low; U: unclear; NR: not reported; ROB: risk of bias; TCM: traditional Chinese medicine; outcome: ① clinical efficacy; ② YGTSS (Yale Global Tic Severity Scale); ③ YGTSS motor tic scores; ④ YGTSS vocal tic scores; ⑤ recurrence rate; ⑥ TCMSSS (TCM Syndrome Score Scale); ⑦ adverse reaction.