GSR (e.g., 24RP + 8WM&CSF + GSR) |
The most effective strategy for balancing motion‐related effects across functional conditions |
GSR remains controversial |
|
Censoring (24RP + 8WM&CSF + GSR + T/P‐cens) |
The best approach for controlling distance dependent artifacts |
Reduced network identifiability metrics, especially with P‐censoring
T‐censoring is prone to introduce additional biases
|
If possible, exclude high‐moving subjects (see Parkes et al., 2018)
Distance‐dependent artifacts can also be controlled with lenient thresholds (FDjenk >0.2; see figure S13)
|
aCompCor50% (24RP+ aCompCor50%) |
Best non‐GSR based pipeline |
It might overfit the data, depending on the number of observations. |
Use the preorthogonalization procedure to increase the noise prediction power and to reduce the number of extracted components (see Figure S11) |
aCompCor (24RP+ aCompCor) |
Lower number of consumed tDoF compared to aCompCor50% |
|
Use the preorthogonalization procedure to increase the noise prediction power (see Figure S11) |
ICA‐AROMA |
|
Depending on the number of observations, it might require a considerable number of tDoF |
In long multiple‐condition experiment, evaluate the possibility of performing ICA‐AROMA in each epoch separately in order to reduce the number of noise‐classified components (see Figure S12) |
RP (RP12, RP24) |
Effective in combination with other strategies |
It might remove true signals covarying with head motion |
Prefer 24RP over 12RP |