Skip to main content
. 2008 Apr;29(4):681–687. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0901

Table 2:

AVM data and CBF comparisons ipsilateral and contralateral to AVM

Patient Grade* Shunt (%) CBF (mL/100 g/min)
CBFmean BGips BGcont Thalips Thalcont GMips GMcont WMips WMcont
1 3 23.42 50.7 49.6 37.8 51.2 53.9 61.7 58.9 29.8 23.8
2 3 19.80 54.7 44.3 47 66.8 76.6 85.9 53.3 25.4 15.5
3 2 4.90 52.3 39.0 49.0 45.8 42.9 67.3 78.6 13.6 16.1
4 2 0.64 61.3 67.8 63.6 66.6 48.5 84.5 88.2 23.8 34.4
5 2 3.13 39.0 35.0 36.7 48.4 45.1 49.7 37.1 17.4 22.2
6 3 10.72 39.7 39.3 41.4 36.0 40.1 48.0 62.8 21.6 25.0
7 4 29.74 48.2 34.6 44.7 42.6 58.6 62.3 51.2 39.7 35.8
Mean 49.4 44.3 45.7 51.1 52.2 65.6 61.5 24.5 24.7

Note:—CBFmean indicates mean brain cerebral blood flow excluding AVM and associated structures; GM (WM), gray matter (white matter) blood flow averaged from regions of interest anterior and posterior to the AVM; Thal, thalamus; ips, ipsilateral; cont, contralateral.

*

Grade indicates total Spetzler-Martin grade (sum of scores for size, involvement of eloquent brain, and drainage pattern as listed in Table 1).