Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 19.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Access. 2020 Dec 18;9:5119–5127. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3045906

TABLE 3.

Comparison of results between proposed model, mpcnn model and DRLS algorithm for all metrics over each reported feature.

Feature IoU MCC Recall Precision F2 Method
Cyst Mean 0.417 0.517 0.604 0.823 0.570 Proposed Model
Cyst Std. 0.286 0.302 0.378 0.220 0.336
Nodule Mean 0.533 0.612 0.653 0.845 0.663
Nodule Std. 0.269 0.277 0.321 0.236 0.290
Thyroid Mean 0.739 0.813 0.869 0.843 0.846
Thyroid Std. 0.214 0.205 0.211 0.161 0.214
Cyst Mean 0.029 0.070 0.262 0.040 0.355 MPCCN model
Cyst Std. 0.055 0.121 0.360 0.088 0.355
Nodule Mean 0.069 −0.028 0.996 0.069 0.230
Nodule Std. 0.073 0.028 0.005 0.073 0.182
Thyroid Mean 0.142 −0.023 0.999 0.142 0.422
Thyroid Std. 0.074 0.019 0.002 0.074 0.162
Cyst Mean 0.222 0.357 0.999 0.222 0.438 DRLS algorithm
Cyst Std. 0.194 0.111 0.000 0.194 0.188
Nodule Mean 0.396 0.538 0.999 0.405 0.683
Nodule Std. 0.121 0.099 0.000 0.113 0.150
Thyroid Mean 0.451 0.595 0.999 0.450 0.787
Thyroid Std. 0.112 0.081 0.000 0.112 0.112