Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Sens J. 2021 Oct 1;21(3):3066–3076. doi: 10.1109/jsen.2020.3028208

TABLE I.

Review of FBG-based continuum manipulator distal-end position estimation (dpe) error by different research groups (cm = continuum manipulator, od = outside diameter, ξ = deflection ratio, κ = curvature, nr = not reported, na = not applicable).

Research Group FBG Sensor Design CM Free Constrained
# Fibers (# FBG) Substrate (OD) # Sensors Config. Length (mm) Sensor Assembly DPE (mm) Mean (Std) ξ (%) κ (m−1) DPE (mm) Mean (Std) ξ (%) κ (m−1)
Roesthuis et al. [8] 3 (4) NiTi wire
(1.0 mm)
1 Triangular 160 In Backbone No Calib.:
x: 2.04 (1.58)
y: 2.03 (1.77)
With Calib.:
x: 0.96 (0.46)
y: 0.44 (0.26)
18.75
2.37
NR NA
Liu et al. [7] 1 (3) 2 NiTi wires
(0.125 mm)
2 Triangular 35 In Side
Lumen
0.41 (0.30) 57.14
50.00
0.61 (0.15)
0.93 (0.05)
0.23 (0.1)
42.86
27.00
Xu et al. [9] 3 (1) NiTi tube
(2.0 mm)
1 Helical 90 Wrapped on CM NR NA NR NA
Farvardin et al. [10] 1 (3) 2 NiTi wires
(0.125 mm)
2 Triangular 35 In Side Lumen 1.14 (0.77)
0.81 (0.99)
3.49 (1.13)
42.86
27.00
2.73 (0.77)
0.96 (0.35)
22.86
14.22
Ryu et al. [11] 1 (NR) Polymer tube
(1.05 mm)
1 Triangular 80 Along
Substrate
0.84 (0.62) 50.39
14.00
NR NA
Wei et al. [12] 1 (4) NiTi wire
(0.3 mm)
1 Helical 110 Wrapped on CM NR NA NR NA
Chitalia et al. [13] 1 (1) NiTi spine
(0.57 mm)
1 N/A 20.5
100
In Backbone NR NA NR NA