Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 2;31(4):2349–2356. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07315-5

Table 4.

Screw gradings per reader and modality of cases where CBCT and CT differed in their final screw rating (i.e., correct/incorrect screw rating)

Reader 1—CBCT Reader 2—CBCT Reader 3—CBCT Reader 1—CT Reader 2—CT Reader 3—CT Pedicle Follow-up time, CT (months) Breach direction Pedicle:screw width ratio
Case: False negative 2 1 1 1 2 2 T9 left 12 Lateral 1.25
Case: False positive #1 2 2 2 1 1 1 T7 left 12 Lateral 0.67
Case: False positive #2 1 2 2 1 2 1 T7 left 0 Lateral 0.78
Case: False positive #3 2 2 2 1 1 1 T11 left 7 Medial 1.44
Case: False positive #4 2 2 2 0 1 1 T10 left 8 Lateral 1.20
Case: False positive #5 2 2 2 1 1 1 T9 right 9 Lateral 0.89
Case: False positive #6 2 1 2 1 1 1 T10 right 9 Lateral 0.84

CBCT cone beam computed tomography, CT computed tomography