Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 10;20(2):403–431. doi: 10.1007/s10237-020-01391-8

Table 3.

CORA scores for the ADAPT model on brain–skull relative motion in comparison with previous models

Exp. casesa
(Hardy et al. 2007)
ADAPT (this study) Original KTH head modelb
(Kleiven 2007)
KTH-FSI modelc
(Zhou et al. 2019a)
KTH detailed head modeld
(Zhou et al. 2019b)
C288-T3 0.588 0.423 0.540 0.538
C380-T1 0.694 0.560 N/A 0.749
C380-T2 0.549 0.416 N/A 0.623
C380-T3 0.650 0.503 N/A 0.677
C380-T4 0.658 0.551 0.646 0.721
C380-T6 0.625 0.511 N/A 0.702
C393-T3 0.555 0.500 N/A 0.573
Average 0.617 ± 0.055 0.493 ± 0.057 N/A 0.655 ± 0.079

aFor each case, one CORA score is reported, which is the mean of CORA scores for all the evaluated NDTs as plotted in “Appendix 2”. bSimulations run for all the seven cases using the KTH head model described in Kleiven (2007) and CORA scores newly calculated. cCORA scores recalculated based on curves reported in the original study where a different CORA calculation was used. N/A: cases not run in the original study; dCORA scores for the first six cases newly calculated based on curves reported in the original study as CORA scores were not reported. For case C393-T3, simulation is run for this study with CORA score newly calculated