Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;7:28. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00193-9

Fig. 5. Gut microbiome composition of germ-free mice after a fecal microbiota transplantation from Dom or Sub donor mice.

Fig. 5

Fig. 5

a Experimental timeline. Germ-free (GF) mice (n = 17) underwent a fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) of either Dom-derived microbiota (GF/Dom, n = 7), Sub-derived microbiota (GF/Sub, n = 7), or PBS (GF/Con, n = 3). After an adaptation period, the mice underwent a series of behavioral assessments (FST; forced swim test; TCST: three-chamber Sociability test; DSR: dominant–submissive relationship test) and their adipose tissues were removed and analyzed. b Principal component analysis of the gut microbiota of GF/Con, GF/Dom, and GF/Sub mice, (n = 17) at Day 7 post-FMT, demonstrating the clustering of the gut microbiome in each group, as well as in GF mice and in the donor mice. c A heatmap of the microbial composition of the samples at the species level, with the top 100 most variant species identified. Taxa with similar distributions are grouped together. d Relative abundance up to the genus level. An additional figure up to the order level (for significantly altered bacteria) is presented in Supplementary Fig. 4. e LEfSe cladogram of gut microbiota in the different mouse groups. Taxa whose distributions among different groups are significantly different (p < 0.05 and the effect size >2). f Abundance histograms of the Mycoplasmataceae biomarker in Sub mice, detected by LEfSe as the marker of GF/Sub mice. Each bar represents the relative abundance of the specified taxa in an individual mouse. Statistical significance was assessed using a one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction.