Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;34:9. doi: 10.1186/s41155-021-00175-y

Table 11.

Case Study Evaluation-tool (CaSE) checklist for essential components in systematic case studies. Recommended responses: Yes, No, unclear or not applicable

Methodology
 1. The rationale behind choosing the case study method
 2. Description of research design and aims
 3. Description of research participants, including:
  3a. Patients/clients
  3b. Therapists, clinical supervisors
  3c. Researchers/data analysts (research team)
 4. Description of research procedures, including:
  4a. Evaluation of existing literature and research
  4b. Data collection methods
  4c. Data analysis methods
  4d. Data triangulation procedures
  4e. Research appraisal tools and instruments
 5. Description of researchers’ reflexivity (awareness of the relationship between the researcher and research study), including:
  5a. Research assumptions pertaining to objectives
  5b. Research biases pertaining to data analysis
  5c. Differentiation between assumptions and views made by different researchers/therapists
 6. Description of research limitations, including:
  6a. Congruity between research data and research aims and objectives
  6b. Research appraisal and validity
 7. Relevant ethical information, including:
  7a. Patient’s informed consent
  7b. Anonymisation of specific clinical material
Clinical components
 8. Description of patient’s history, including:
  8a. Demographics
  8b. Cultural context
  8c. Socio-economic context
  8d. Interpersonal history (family and other relationships)
 9. Description of patient’s clinical condition, including:
  9a. Current and past diagnosis (with reference to DSM, ICD and other diagnostic manuals)
  9b. Current and past symptoms and experiences
  9c. Previously received treatment
  9d. The use of medication
 10. Description of patient’s problems through:
  10a. Diagnostic tools (therapist’s assessment)
  10b. Self–report questionnaires (patient’s self–assessment)
 11. Description of course of therapy and treatment, including:
  11a. Therapeutic modality
  11b. Therapeutic setting (number of sessions, frequency, private/public practice)
  11c. Therapeutic relationship
  11d. Timeline of relevant treatment events/sessions
  11e. Follow-up information
  11f. Treatment outcomes
  11g. Complicating factors
 12. Description of clinical decision–making and reflexivity (awareness of the relationship between the therapist and the treatment process), including:
  12a. Clinical assumptions pertaining to diagnosis
  12b. Clinical biases pertaining to therapeutic techniques and interpretations (especially in relation to therapist’s therapeutic modality)
 13. Description of therapist where relevant, including:
  13a. Professional experience
  13b. Demographics
  13c. Cultural context
  13d. Socio-economic context
Theory
 14. Clear description of theoretical references and key concepts
 15. Description of how clinical decision–making relates to the chosen theoretical framework
 16. Clear statement of theoretical findings
 17. Clear description of evidence for and limitations of the chosen theoretical framework, including:
  17a. Validity (does the case study attend its research objectives and aims sufficiently? Do researchers use relevant theoretical concepts, clinical techniques and research methods?)
  17b. Reliability (does the case study provide sufficient, detailed and reflexive information on how it arrived at its findings?)
 18. Description of transferability of findings (relevance to other cases), including:
  18a. Transferability to psychotherapy research
  18b. Transferability to psychotherapy practice
  18c. Relevance to policy in private and/or public healthcare
  18d. Relevance to specific clinical population and setting