Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Pharm. 2021 Jan 22;596:120206. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120206

Table 5.

Pharmacokinetic parameters of ritonavir (RTV) in rats (n = 6).

Formulations AUC0-t * (mg × h/L) T1/2 (h) Cmax (ng/mL) Frel (%) a Frel (%) b

LPV/RTV NP 1.05 ± 0.10 13.12 ± 0.52 203.54 ± 31.95 415.57 ± 95.67 239.90 ± 42.08
RTV NP 0.59 ± 0.06 12.38 ± 4.37 87.01 ± 7.90Δ 230.90 ± 44.25 134.71 ± 28.75
Kaletra® 0.45 ± 0.10 9.02 ± 1.22 58.73 ± 15.32 / /
RTV raw drug 0.26 ± 0.04 13.85 ± 4.89 24.10 ± 3.85 / /

RTV: ritonavir; NP: nanoparticle

Δ

No significant difference in Cmax between the RTV NP and the commercial product (Kaletra®) (P > 0.05) while significant difference (P < 0.05) was observed when comparing all other testing groups.

*

Significant difference in AUC0-t was observed when comparing all testing groups (P < 0.05).

a

calculated based on AUC0-t by comparing to the RTV raw drug

b

calculated based on AUC0-t by comparing to Kaletra®