Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 18;81(6):1246–1259.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.01.005

Table 1.

Cryo-EM data collection, model refinement, and validation statistics

High-resolution EMDB:EMD-12165 (PDB: 7BFP) Medium-resolution (ESRF1) EMDB:EMD-12166 (PDB: 7BFQ) INTS4-focused EMDB:EMD-12164 (PDB: 7BFQ) CTD2-focused EMDB:EMD-12163 (PDB: 7BFQ)
Data collection and processing

Magnification 165,000 165,000 165,000 165,000
Voltage (kV) 300 300 300 300
Electron exposure (e–/Å2) 42–46.8 46.8 46.8 46.8
Defocus range (μm) −0.5 to −3.0 −0.5 to −3.0 −0.5 to −3.0 −0.5 to −3.0
Pixel size (Å) 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83
Symmetry imposed C1 C1 C1 C1
Initial particle images (no.) 9,124,445 1,017,432 1,017,432 1,017,432
Final particle images (no.) 26358 21,866 21,235 19,938
Map resolution (Å) 3. 4.1 6.5 6.5
FSC threshold 0.143 0.143 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 3.4–5 4–6 5–9 5–9

Refinement

Model resolution (Å) 4.1 (average)
FSC threshold 0.5
FSCaverage(Refmac) 0.7 (at 3.5 Å)
Model resolution range (Å) 3.4–5
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −50

Model composition

Non-hydrogen atoms 10,668
Protein residues 1340

B factors (Å2)

Protein 148

RMSDs

Bond lengths (Å) 0.01
Bond angles (°) 0.16

Model validation

MolProbity score 2.2
Clashscore 8.7
Poor rotamers (%) 2.4

Ramachandran plot

Favored (%) 93.1
Allowed (%) 6.5
Disallowed (%) 0.4