Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 19;19:81. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02188-4

Table 2.

Subgroup analysis based on the tumor size and the age

Criteria OS RFS
NO. of studies NP HR (95% CI) I2 p value Q test No. of studies NP HR (95% CI) I2 p value Q test
TACE+RFA vs. TACE
 ≤ 3cm 4 623 0.57 (0.41–0.81) 24% 0.27 2 365 0.47 (0.30–0.73) 62% 0.10
 > 3cm 9 1238 0.61 (0.52–0.73) 0% 0.63 3 598 0.56 (0.35–0.89) 67% 0.05
 Age < 60 6 783 0.61 (0.51–0.73) 0% 0.57 1 83 0.51 (0.30–0.87) NA NA
 Age ≥ 60 6 834 0.58 (0.46–0.74) 0% 0.74 4 531 0.46 (0.36–0.57) 9% 0.35
TACE+RFA vs. RFA
 ≤ 3cm 3 533 0.77(0.55–1.09) 22% 0.28 3 533 0.82 (0.57–1.19) 0% 0.91
 > 3cm 6 669 0.61 (0.49–0.76) 0% 0.54 5 678 0.55 (0.45–0.67) 0% 0.47
 Age < 60 5 799 0.61 (0.49–0.77) 41% 0.15 4 731 0.55 (0.43–0.70) 0% 0.68
 Age ≥ 60 4 318 0.72 (0.49–1.04) 0% 0.51 4 318 0.80 (0.58–1.11) 0% 0.63

TACE transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, RFA radiofrequency ablation, NP number of patients, NA not applicable, HR hazard ratio, OS overall survival, RFS recurrence-free survival