Table 3.
Quality assessment results against the effective public health practice project quality assessment tool for human observational studies.
References | Selection bias | Design | Confounders | Blinding | Data collection method | Withdrawals/dropouts | Global ratings |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Al Batanony et al. (15) | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Cyprowski et al. (16) | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Douwes et al. (17) | Moderate | Weak | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Weak |
Heldal et al. (18) | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Heldal et al. (19) | Strong | Weak | Strong | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Heldal et al. (20) | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Strong |
Lee et al. (21) | Strong | Weak | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate | Moderate |
Melbostad et al. (22) | Moderate | Moderate | Weak | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Richardson (23) | Moderate | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate |
Rylander (24) | Strong | Weak | Strong | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Saad et al. (25) | Strong | Weak | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Smit et al. (26) | Moderate | Weak | Strong | Strong | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Tabrizi et al. (27) | Moderate | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate |
Thorn (28) | Strong | Weak | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Weak |
Tschopp et al. (29) | Moderate | Weak | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Strong | Moderate |