Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May 23;19(3):547–555. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.05.038

Table 1:

Model Inputs: Test characteristics and participation assumptions associated with colorectal cancer screening.

TEST CHARACTERISTICS

Specificity and sensitivity of FITa
 Specificity (per person) 96.7%
 Sensitivity adenoma 1–5mm 0.0%
 Sensitivity adenoma 6–9mm 17.6%
 Sensitivity adenoma 10+ mm 34.0%
 Sensitivity cancer long before clinical diagnosis 29.5%
 Sensitivity cancer shortly before clinical diagnosisb 66.0%
Specificity and sensitivity of colonoscopyc,d
 Specificity 86%
 Sensitivity adenoma 1–5mm 75%
 Sensitivity adenoma 6–9mm 85%
 Sensitivity adenoma 10+ mm 95%
 Sensitivity preclinical cancer 95%
Complication of colonoscopye
 Fatal perforationf 0.0074%
 Bleedingg 0.1640%
 Perforationg 0.0850%
 Otherh 0.3310%

PARTICIPATION

Participation in previous screening episodes
 No prior screening 0%
 Some prior screening 25%
 Reasonable prior screening 50%
 Most prior screening 75%
 Perfect prior screening 100%
 Colonoscopy 10 years prior 0%
 Colonoscopy 15 years prior 0%
Participation in current screening episode 100%
Participation with diagnostic colonoscopyi
 Males 79%
 Females 78%
Participation in surveillanceJ 80%

Abbreviations: FIT = faecal immunochemical test

a.

Specificity and sensitivity of FIT derived from data from the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program15 and were adjusted to an overall positivity of 7.5% which equated to a cut-off level of 23 μg Hb/g feces

b.

We assume that faecal screening is more sensitive in cancers towards the end of the occult bleeding period as they progress towards becoming symptomatic (i.e. visible bleeding) and clinically detectable23

c.

Specificity for colonoscopy is based on Schroy et al, 2013.20 The lack of specificity with endoscopy reflects the detection of non-adenomatous lesions, which, in the case of colonoscopy leads to unnecessary polypectomy, which is associated with an increased risk complications

d.

Sensitivity of colonoscopy for the detection of adenomas and CRC within the reach of the endoscope was obtained from a systematic review on miss rates observed in tandem colonoscopy studies19

e.

Complications are conditional on polypectomy, and we assume that polypectomy is only performed if colonoscopy is positive

f.

Risk of dying from colonoscopy were based on Canadian literature.22 A death was attributed to colonoscopy if it occurred within 30 days following an index colonoscopy.

g.

Complications of colonoscopy were based on Canadian literature.21, 22 A complication is considered as individuals who were admitted to hospital with colonoscopy related events during the 30 days following the index colonoscopy

h.

Other events include post-polypectomy syndrome, cardiac events, syncope/hypotension, gastrointestinal symptoms, splenic/hepatic hematoma, fall/injury, thrombophlebitis, hyponatremia, oesophageal variceal haemorrhage, and various other symptoms

i.

The participation with diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive faecal test is taken from Cancer Quality Council of Ontario13 and is the same for all screening scenarios except under the assumption of perfect adherence to screening

j.

The participation rate for colonoscopy surveillance was assumed to be 80%, based on data from US clinical practice 14 and is the same for all screening scenarios except under the assumption of perfect adherence to screening where we assume 100% adherence to surveillance