Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 19;62(3):357–365. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13281

Table 1.

Sample characteristics

School performance sample (n = 2,362) IQ sample (n = 3,737)
n n
Child characteristics
Sex, % girls 2,362 52.6% 3,737 51.5%
Ethnicity, % 2,350 3,716
Dutch 70.8% 66.8%
Other Western 8.5% 8.6%
Non‐Western 20.6% 24.6%
Auditory hallucinations, % 2,362 3,737
No 74.2% 73.9%
A bit 20.4% 19.7%
Clearly 5.4% 6.4%
Visual hallucinations, % 2,362 3,737
No 84.1% 83.4%
A bit 12.8% 12.9%
Clearly 3.1% 3.7%
Age at PEs assessment, mean (SD) 2,362 9.8 (0.3) 3,737 9.8 (0.4)
PEs assessment, % filled out alone 2,362 48.1% 3,736 44.3%
CITO test score, median (IQR), range (501–550) 2,362 541.0 (13.0) 2,066 541.0 (13.0)
Age at CITO test assessment, mean (SD) 2,119 11.8 (0.4) 1,983 11.9 (0.4)
Nonverbal IQ, mean (SD) 2,066 105.2 (14.2) 3,737 103.3 (14.5)
Age at IQ assessment, mean (SD) 2,222 6.1 (0.4) 3,737 6.0 (0.4)
Maternal characteristics
Educational level, % 2,215 3,511
High 67.5% 62.9%
Medium 30.6% 35.1%
Low 1.9% 2.0%
Nonverbal IQ, median (IQR) 2,177 100.0 (17.0) 3,629 100.0 (17.0)

PEs, psychotic experiences. School performance and IQ sample are overlapping (n = 2,066).