Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 25;128(5):866–878. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16472

Table 2.

Menstrual outcomes.

Variables

Single‐layer closure (n = 1144) Double‐layer closure (n = 1148) Outcome measure Adjusted effect estimate (95% CI)* P
Postmenstrual spotting, days/month n = 774 n = 770
Median (IQR) 0.0 (0.0–2.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) Median difference 0.00 (−0.08 to 0.08) 1.0
Mean (SD) 1.33 (3.00) 1.26 (2.77) Mean difference −0.07 (−0.37 to 0.22) 0.810
Present at least one day per month 275/774 (35.5%) 264/770 (34.3%)

Relative risk

Risk difference

0.96 (0.84 to 1.10)

−0.01 (−0.06 to 0.04)

0.580

0.602

Total days blood loss, days/month 6.0 (3.5) 5.9 (3.0) Mean difference −0.1 (−0.4 to 0.3) 0.752
Duration of menstruation, days/month 5.5 (2.3) 5.7 (2.5) Mean difference 0.1 (−0.1 to 0.4) 0.276
Dysmenorrhoea, scale 0–10 4.0 (2.0–6.0) 4.0 (2.0–6.0) Median difference 0.0 (−0.4 to 0.4) 1.0
Need for treatment of gynaecological complaints** 13/913 (1.4%) 25/903 (2.8%)

Relative risk

Risk difference

1.93 (0.99 to 3.75)

0.02 (0.00 to 0.03)

0.052

Lost to follow‐up 204 (17.8%) 212 (18.5%)

Relative risk

Risk difference

1.04 (0.88 to 1.24)

0.01 (−0.03 to 0.04)

0.655

0.770

Amenorrhoea 166 (14.5%) 166 (14.5%)

Relative risk

Risk difference

1.01 (0.83 to 1.22)

0.00 (−0.03 to 0.03)

0.952

0.997

Data are medians (IQRs), means (SDs) or n (%), unless otherwise indicated; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; CS, caesarean section.

*

Adjusted for timing of CS.

**

Data available for 913 women in the single‐layer group and 903 women in the double‐layer group; complaints for abdominal pain or abnormal uterine bleeding, treatment could be medicinal, surgical, combined or ‘other’.

Postmenstrual spotting (mean and median) was primary outcome and all others were secondary outcomes.

Secondary outcomes. Confidence intervals and P values for mean difference in spotting days per month have been determined using bootstrapping. Effect estimates are calculated with single‐layer closure as the reference group.