TABLE 3.
Time (hrs) | Applied load (N) | Applied stress (MPa) | Species | Comparable in vivo activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Adams 260 | 4 | *** | Human | Body weight (BW) | |
Koeller 281 , 282 | 0.08 | 950 | 0.52 | Human | Holding <20 kg near body |
Kolditz 283 | 24 | 0.60 | Human | Holding 20 kg near body | |
1.20 | High Loading | ||||
Keller 28 | 0.5 | *** | *** | Human | Adjusted by BW |
Ohshima 284 | 24 | 49‐294 | 0.06‐0.34 | Porcine | Lying supine to walking |
Holmes 285 | 0.5‐6 | 1600 | 0.88 | Human | High loading |
Li 286 | 1 | *** | *** | Human | Adjusted by BW |
Ekstrom 287 | 0.22 | 50 | 0.06 | Porcine | Lying supine |
100 | 0.11 | Less than slouched sitting | |||
Riches 288 | 0.33 | 1.00 | Human | High loading | |
Palmer 289 | 0.33 | 0.40 | Murine | Mid‐range during walking | |
0.80 | High loading | ||||
Sarver 290 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 0.25 | Murine | Sitting relaxed |
Boxberger 122 | 0.75 | 4.5 | 0.28 | Rat | Standing |
Johannessen 262 | 2 | 200 | 0.50 | Ovine | Holding <20 kg near body |
Heuer 130 | 0.25 | 500 | 0.27 | Human | Sitting relaxed |
Luo 111 | 2 | 1000 | 0.55 | Human | Holding <20 kg near body |
Masuoka 103 | 0.15 | 1.00 | Rat‐tail | High loading | |
1.5 | |||||
15 | |||||
O'Connell 121 , 291 , 292 | 0.33 | 1000 | 0.55 | Human | Holding <20 kg near body |
Korecki 293 | 1 | 0.20 | Bovine | Sitting | |
Barbir 274 | 0.5 | 12.5 | 0.78 | Rat | High loading |
Pollintine 278 | 0.5 | 1150 | 0.85 | Human | High loading |
1 | |||||
2 | |||||
Campana 294 | 0.17 | 400 | 0.27 | Human | Sitting Relaxed |
Hwang 295 | 1.67 | 1.00 | Rat‐tail | High Loading | |
Holguin 296 | 1 | 6 | 0.37 | Rat | Mid‐range during walking |
Martin 297 | 1 | 1.5 | 1.19 | Murine‐tail | High Loading |
van der Veen 298 | 24 | 0.80 | Human | High Loading | |
Bailey 299 | 0.33 | 0.50 | Murine | Holding <20 kg near body | |
Pei 300 | 0.08 | 200 | 0.32 | Ovine | Sitting with straight back |
600 | 0.95 | High Loading | |||
1000 | 1.59 | High Loading | |||
Bezci 190 | 4 | 200 | 0.41 | Bovine | Mid‐range during walking |
1000 | 2.04 | High loading | |||
Schmidt 277 | 8 | 0.50 | Bovine | Holding <20 kg near body | |
Russo 141 | 1 | 0.25 | Ovine | Sitting Relaxed |
Note: For studies that did not report stress, applied stress was calculated by using either the average disc area reported in the paper or species‐specific disc area from data in O'Connell et al and/or Beckstein et al (italicized stress values). 99 , 121 Applied stress was then compared to in vivo loading conditions using data provided in Table 2. Bovine discs are acquired from the caudal region of the spine due to cuts made in the lumbar spine for the meat industry. All other discs were taken from the lumbar region unless specified (eg, for rat or mouse).