Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 17;22(5):904–914. doi: 10.1002/cbic.202000612

Table 1.

The determined T m and T agg values of WT LEH and LEH variants based on collected label‐free fluorescence, DSF and SLS.

Sample

Mutations

Predicted T 50 [°C]

Expl. T m [°C]

Expl. T agg [°C]

WT LEH

41

46.38±0.01

42.6±0.06

LEH‐1

S15P/A19K/T85V/G89C/S91C/L114V/E124D

69.14

65.95±0.36

53.4±0.02

LEH‐2

S15P/A19K/T85V/G89C/S91C/L114V/I116V/E124D

69.04

60.09±0.02

56.6±0.19

LEH‐3

I5C/S15P/A19K/L74F/T85V/G89C/S91C/L114V/I116V/E124D

66.21

73.62±0.33

63.3±0.00

LEH‐4

S15P/A19K/M78F/I80V/T85V/G89C/S91C/N92K/L114V/I116V/F139V/L147F

66.13

61.31±0.33

49.3±0.10

LEH‐5

S15P/A19K/M78F/I80V/T85V/G89C/S91C/Y96F/L114V/I116V/E124D/F139V/L147F

66.07

71.30±0.33

62.6±0.07

LEH‐F1b

I5C/S15P/A19K/T76K/E84C/T85V/G89C/S91C/N92K/Y96F/E124D

63

63.12±0.46

55.6±0.21