Table 5.
Comparison table of results found by large-scale studies.
Number of patients | Main findings | |
---|---|---|
MOON Cohort Study | 263 | Revision was required in 0 of 61 patients (0.0%) with grafts greater than 8mm in diameter and 14 of 202 patients (6.5%) with 8 mm or smaller grafts (p=0.037) |
Snaebjörnsson et al. [15] | Cases: 560 | The likelihood of revision surgery for every 0.5-mm increase in the HT autograft diameter between 7.0 and 10.0mm was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.75–0.99;p=0.03) |
Controls: 1680 | ||
Alkhalaf et al. (this study) | 711 | Patients with a 4-strand autograft size that was less than 8mm were 7.2 times more at risk for ACLR failure (RR 7.2, 95% CI: 6.02; 8.35, p=0.007) |