Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;41(11):2496–2511. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1985-20.2020

Table 1.

Participant characteristicsa

AP musicians Non-AP musicians Non-musicians
No. of participants 52 51 50
Sex (female/male) 24/28 24/27 24/26
Handedness (right/left/both) 45/4/3 46/4/1 44/6/0
Age 26.37 ± 4.98 years 25.29 ± 4.42 years 25.86 ± 5.52 years
rsfMRI movementb 8.90 ± 16.31 scans 5.61 ± 11.77 scans 5.26 ± 15.43 scans
DWI movementc 0.47 ± 0.11 0.48 ± 0.11 0.44 ± 0.12
Musical aptitude (AMMA) total 66.04 ± 6.18 63.45 ± 6.96 52.80 ± 9.22
Musical aptitude (AMMA) tonal 32.33 ± 3.67 30.55 ± 4.23 25.34 ± 5.02
Musical aptitude (AMMA) rhythm 33.71 ± 2.78 32.90 ± 3.03 27.46 ± 4.58
Tone-naming score 76.41 ± 19.96% 23.66 ± 19.16% 8.41 ± 3.52%
Age of onset of musical training 6.06 ± 2.40 6.53 ± 2.39
Years of musical training 20.31 ± 5.26 years 18.76 ± 5.01
Cumulative musical training 16,347.68 ± 12,582.35 hours 13,830.10 ± 9985.04 hours

aContinuous measures are given as mean ± SD.

bNumber of scans with FD ≥ 0.5 (Power et al., 2012).

cMean of average scan-to-scan translational (in millimeters) and rotational motion (in degrees) (Yendiki et al., 2014).