Table 7.
Edges of statistically significant functional subnetwork differing between AP musicians and non-musiciansa
| Contrast | Node 1 | Node 2 | t |
|---|---|---|---|
| AP > Non-mus | Left PT | Right PT | 4.35 |
| AP > Non-mus | Left pOp | Left PT | 4.26 |
| AP > Non-mus | Right IFG,po | Right pSTG | 4.15 |
| AP > Non-mus | Left pSTG | Right PT | 3.94 |
| AP > Non-mus | Left pSTG | Right aSMG | 3.88 |
| AP > Non-mus | Right pSTG | Left cOp | 3.83 |
| AP > Non-mus | Right pSTG | Right PT | 3.66 |
| AP > Non-mus | Right pSTG | Left PT | 3.61 |
| AP > Non-mus | Left pOp | Left PP | 3.53 |
| AP > Non-mus | Left cOp | Left HG | 3.52 |
| AP > Non-mus | Left cOp | Right HG | 3.5 |
| AP > Non-mus | Left pOp | Right PT | 3.46 |
| AP > Non-mus | Left aSTG | Left pOp | 3.44 |
| AP > Non-mus | Right pOp | Right HG | 3.41 |
| AP > Non-mus | Right IFG,po | Left pSTG | 3.4 |
aEdges are ordered according to their descriptive strength with respect to group differences. aSMG, anterior SMG; aSTG, anterior STG; cOp, central operculum; Non-mus, non-musicians; pSTG, posterior STG; t, t statistic describing the strength of group difference in functional connectivity between Node 1 and Node 2.