Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 17;41(11):2496–2511. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1985-20.2020

Table 9.

Edges of statistically significant structural subnetwork differing between AP musicians and non-musiciansa

Contrast Node 1 Node 2 t
AP > Non-mus Right insula Right ptFG 3.39
AP > Non-mus Right pOp Right preCG 3.23
AP > Non-mus Right ACC Right postCG 3.2
AP > Non-mus Left aSTG Right postCG 3.2
AP > Non-mus Left preCG Right ptFG 3.12
AP > Non-mus Right postCG Right preCG 3.09
AP > Non-mus Left insula Right PCC 3.03
AP > Non-mus Right PCC Right postCG 2.97
AP > Non-mus Left preCG Left TP 2.95
AP > Non-mus Right FP Right preCG 2.88
AP > Non-mus Right PCC Right ptFG 2.87
AP > Non-mus Right fOp Right postCG 2.81
AP > Non-mus Right postCG Right toFG 2.81
AP > Non-mus Right FP Right postCG 2.8

aEdges are ordered according to their descriptive strength with respect to group differences. ACC, anterior cingulate cortex; aSTG, Anterior STG; fOp, frontal operculum; Non-mus, non-musicians; ptFG, posterior temporal fusiform gyrus; t, t statistic describing the strength of group difference in structural connectivity between Node 1 and Node 2; toFG, temporal occipital fusiform gyrus; TP, temporal pole.