Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 22;12:1810. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21888-9

Fig. 3. Mobility across spatial scales.

Fig. 3

A Relative risk of movement of virus to each province compared to moving to a randomly selected province after 20 generations. The black dots represent the ten largest cities in Thailand. B Relative risk of movement of virus to each grid cell within central Bangkok after 20 generations compared to moving to a randomly selected cell. The cumulative distance distribution for national (C) and central Bangkok (D) of how far cases are from home (purple/brown), the distances of single transmissions (dark blue/dark green) and distances after 20 transmissions (light blue/light green). The dashed line represents the cumulative distribution function of completely spatially random movement. E The number of Bangkok locations with at least one case for different scenarios relative to that in the base model after 20 generations. The different scenarios are: initial introductions are in the most connected location, initial introductions are in the least connected location; no reduced mobility in cases compared to the susceptible population, case/susceptible population mobility is equal to adult mobility and no impact of local immunity on where transmission occurs. F For the same scenarios, the number of provinces with at least one case relative to that in the base model after 20 generations. The boxplots in panels (E) and (F) represent the mean estimate, with the bounds of the box representing 25th and 75th percentiles and the minima and maxima representing 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.