Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 21;27(11):1043–1054. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i11.1043

Table 3.

Comparison of clinical outcomes between Okayama University Hospital and other hospitals

Institution (patients/lesions)
OUH (17/20)
Other hospitals (21/28)
P value
Median age, yr (range) 70 (57-83) 73 (58-84) 0.28
Male, n (%) 15 (88) 19 (79) 0.72
Reconstruction route of gastric tube, n < 0.01
Antethoracic 7 0
Retrosternal 7 4
Posterior mediastinal 3 17
Median tumor size, mm (range) 18 (8-60) 15 (4-40) 0.21
depth, M/SM, n 16/4 24/4 0.6
Ulcerative findings positive, n (%) 3 (15) 4 (14) 0.94
Median procedure time, min (range) 50 (20-180) 108 (32-334) < 0.01
En bloc resection, n (%) 19 (95) 25 (89) 0.48
Curative resection (eCura A or B), n (%) 17 (85) 21 (75) 0.4
Adverse events during ESD, n (%) 1 (5.0) 1 (3.6) 0.8
Adverse events post ESD, n (%) 3 (15) 2 (7.1) 0.37

OUH: Okayama University Hospital; ESD: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; M: Intramucosal; SM: Submucosal.