Table IV.
Author(s) (year) | Interventions | Primary end point(s) | Results | (Refs.) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Langer et al, 2016 | Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy | ORR | 55% vs. 29% | (92) |
The incidence of grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events | 39% vs. 26% | |||
Gandhi et al, 2018 | Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy vs. Placebo + Chemotherapy | Rate of Overall survival at 12 months | 69.2% vs. 49.4% | (93) |
PFS | 8.8 months vs. 4.9 months | |||
Paz-Ares et al, 2018 | Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy vs. Placebo + Chemotherapy | PFS | 6.4 months vs. 4.8 months | (94) |
OS | 15.9 months vs. 11.3 months | |||
Deng et al, 2014 | Irradiation (IR) + Anti-PD-L1 vs. Anti-PD-L1 vs. IR | Tumor volume | 25.59±10.26 mm vs. 587.3±169.1 mm vs. 402.8±76.73 mm | (95) |
The percentage of MDSCs in the total CD45+ cell population | 0.38±0.16% vs. 7.33±2.22% vs. 4.78±2.49% | |||
Sharabi et al, 2015 | XRT + Anti-PD-1 | Tumor volume | Inhibited | (99) |
T-cell infiltration | Increased | |||
Dovedi et al, 2014 | RT + PD-1/PD-L1 blocking | Tumor volume | Inhibited | (101) |
Percent survival | Improved | |||
Ahmed et al, 2016 | Stereotactic radiation + Anti-PD-1 | local lesions control rates at 6 and 12 months | 91 and 85% | (102) |
OS rates at 6 and 12 months | 78 and 55% |
PD-1, programmed cell death protein-1; PD-L1, programmed death protein ligand-1.