Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Evid Based Pract Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2020 Jul 9;5(4):414–425. doi: 10.1080/23794925.2020.1784052

Table 3.

Quantitative ratings, and counts of qualitative themes, by segment

Quantitative Ratings
Qualitative Themes
Segment Acceptable Appropriate Effective (EBP) Effective (CBITS) Insuff. EBP info Visuals Testimonial Delivery/Structure Activities Target audience
1. Understanding Student Mental Health, Connection to Education, & Access Gap 3.25 3.42 3.00 -- 15 0 0 10 0 11
2. Vulnerabilities to Adopting and Implementing Non-Evidence-Based Practices 3.17 3.70 3.20 -- 7 0 0 12 3 3
3. Common Myths about Evidence-Based Practice 3.00 3.50 3.08 -- 0 8 3 7 0 0
4. What Does It Mean When Something is Evidence-Based? 3.08 3.17 2.92 2.58 22 2 2 1 3 7
5. Values-Based Action 2.64 2.75 2.83 2.33 3 0 0 0 2 7
6. Individualized Implementation Planning + Common Implementation Barriers 3.08 3.17 2.58 2.42 10 1 1 12 5 0

Mean across all segments 3.04 3.29 2.94 2.44 9.50 1.83 1.00 7.00 2.17 4.67
SD across all segments 1.03 0.80 0.92 1.03 7.37 2.85 1.15 4.90 1.77 4.03

Note. Possible range for all ratings is 0–4. 0 = Not at all. 1 = Barely. 2 = Somewhat. 3 = m Moderately. 4 = Extremely. Numbers in bold indicate relatively low or high ratings, defined as ± .5 SD for quantitative ratings and ± SD for qualitative mentions.