Skip to main content
. 2020 Dec 16;36(2):317–326. doi: 10.1002/mds.28390

TABLE 1.

Longitudinal studies characteristics

Study Total sample Age (y) Disease duration (y) Follow‐up (mo) Newcastle‐Ottawa score Apathy scale Pre‐operative score Post‐operative score Mean change in LEDD (%)
Ardouin et al 44 7 54.0 ± 9.0 NR 3 7 SAS 9.5 ± 3.0 9.8 ± 6.3 −73.6
Castelli et al 45 19 62.1 ± 4.2 14.7 ± 5 17 7 SAS 11.6 ± 4.1 12.6 ± 5.3 −52.1
Castrioto et al 46 36 56.8 ± 8.3 9.3 ± 4.9 12 5 SAS 11.1 ± 4.8 10.4 ± 5.3 −60.3
Chou et al 47 10 62.1 ± 6.5 9.1 ± 5.8 6 7 SAS 13.2 ± 8.6 13.6 ± 7.4 −51.2
Dafsari et al 48 36 62.8 ± 9.1 9.6 ± 5.3 5 4 AES 28.9 ± 7.1 29.6 ± 6.7 −53.3
Dos Santos et al 49 19 60(6.5) 93(3.5) 12 7 SAS 6.9 ± 2.7 9.5 ± 7.7 −39.6
Drapier et al 43 30 59.7 ± 7.6 12.2 ± 2.8 6 7 SAS & AES 13.0 ± 6.5 18.8 ± 9.7 −22.2
Foley et al 50 28 57.5 ± 7.3 18.8 ± 6.1 19.5 6 SAS 10.8 ± 6.0 14.0 ± 11.2 NR
Gesquiere‐Dando et al 51 34 62.7 ± 8.1 9.9 ± 4.3 12 6 LARS −32.6 ± 3.6 −24.4 ± 12.0 −39.4
Higuchi et al 13 25 50.4 ± 9.8 12.5 ± 7 1 7 SAS 5.4 ± 3.1 9.6 ± 9.9 −61.1
Langner‐Lemercier et al 52 40 56.5 ± 7.8 12.0 ± 4.6 12 5 AES 30.9 ± 6.3 33.0 ± 8.9 −38.9
Le Jeune et al 53 12 57.4 ± 8 11.2 ± 2.4 3 6 AES 30.9 ± 4.1 39.1 ± 6.1 −33.6
Lhommee et al 54 73 57.3 ± 7 10.8 ± 2.9 12 7 SAS 6.4 ± 3.3 9.7 ± 4.6 −69.7
Lhommee et al 41 251 52.5 ± 6.3 7.5 ± 2.9 24 8 SAS 9.9 (0.7) 12.7 (0.5) −37.6
Lilleeng et al 55 16 60.0 ± 8.1 12.9 ± 5.7 4.5 8 SAS 14.7 ± 4.1 16.9 ± 5.2 −22.9
Maier et al 56 30 61.2 ± 8.7 12.0 ± 6.79 3 7 AES 34.8 ± 10.9 34.6 ± 9.4 −55.9
Mosley et al 57 a 64 62.2 ± 9.5 9.0 ± 5.2 1.5 7 SAS F‐score: 0.838 NR
Nimura et al 58 39 62.6 ± 6.7 13.3 ± 9.4 6 5 SAS 12.2 ± 7.7 12.0 ± 7.2 NR
Pham et al 59 40 63.4 ± 6.4 12.1 ± 3.8 3 6 AES 30.6 ± 5.9 32.2 ± 6.6 −47.7
Robert et al 17 44 56.3 ± 7.5 11.4 ± 4.1 3 6 AES 31.4 ± 6.4 31.6 ± 7.1 −30.5
Seifried et al 60 11 63.0 ± 7 14.0 ± 4 6 4 SAS 10.8 ± 7.1 12.5 ± 8.6 −51.5
Valldeoriola et al 42 23 57.9 ± 4.8 13.7 6 5 LARS −24 ± 19.9 −27 ± 21.6 −21.4
Voruz et al 61 29 56.5 ± 8.0 11.2 ± 4.2 3 6 AES 31.4 ± 6.5 32.9 ± 8.7 −44.0

Follow‐up, apathy assessment follow‐up in months after the STN DBS operation. All studies used bilateral stimulation. Studies with the variance marked as ± reported standard devations, studies with parentheses reported the standard error. Abbreviations: LEDD, levodopa equivalent daily dosage; SAS, Starkstein Apathy Scale; AES, Apathy Evaluation Scale; LARS, Lille Apathy Rating Scale; NR, not reported.

a

F statistic was provided only.