Table 2.
Intervention | No. Sites | Obs. period (years) |
Residual PD |
CAL gain | PD reduction | REC increase | Residual RDD | RDD reduction | RBL gain | PD change | CAL change | RDD change | RBL change |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OFD | |||||||||||||
Bhutda & Deo, 2013 | 15 | 3 – 5 | 4.9 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 2.8 ± 0.8 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 0.5 ± 1.2 | |||
Flemmig et al., 1998 | 8 | 3.9 ± 1.5 | 0.8 ± 1.4 | 2.2 ± 1.6 | |||||||||
Heijl et al., 1997 | 27 | 5.2 ± 1.5 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | 2.3 ± 1.0 | 0.0 ± 0.7 | ||||||||
Sculean et al., 2004 a | 10 | 5.5 ± 1.2 | 1.3 ± 1.2 | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 1.2 | 0.3 ± 1.1 | ||||||
Sculean, Schwarz et al., 2007 | 9 | 5.6 ± 1.1 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 3.3 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.7 | 0.3 ± 0.5 | ||||||
Nickles et al., 2009 | 10 | >5 | 4.7 ± 1.3 | 3.7 ± 3.4 | 4.4 ± 2.8 | 0.7 ± 2.3 | −0.8 ± 2.5 | −0.1 ± 2.6 | |||||
Petsos et al., 2019 | 10 | 4.4 ± 1.5 | 3.6 ± 2.6 | 4.4 ± 3.1 | 0.8 ± 2.1 | −0.9 ± 0.6 | −0.6 ± 0.4 | ||||||
Sculean, Kiss, et al., 2008 | 9 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 3.5 ± 1.4 | 1.7 ± 1.2 | 0.2 ± 1.6 | 0.2 ± 1.1 | ||||||
Stavropoulos & Karring, 2010 | 5 | 7.6 ± 2.1 | −1.2 ± 2.4 | 0.2 ± 1.9 | 1.4 ± 1.8 | 5.9 ± 1.6 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | −0.2 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 1.9 | 1 ± 2.6 | 0.6 ± 1.2 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | |
Cortellini et al., 2017 b | 11 | 4.5 ± 1.8 | 1.2 ± 2.4 | 3.3 ± 1.9 | 2.1 ± 1.4 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 1.2 | ||||||
Grafting | |||||||||||||
Flemmig et al., 1998, e | 8 | 3 – 5 | 2.7 ± 2.0 | 2.0 ± 2.0 | 2.6 ± 2.2 | ||||||||
Menezes & Rao, 2012_I | 60 | 3.7 ± 1.0 | 3.1 ± 1.1 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 1.0 ± 1.0 | −2.2 ± 0.8 | −2.4 ± 0.9 | ||||||
Mengel et al., 2006 | 20 | 4.2 ± 1.8 | 3.3 ± 2.1 | 3.5 ± 1.4 | 0.2 ± 1.7 | 0.7 ± 1.5 | 0.6 ± 2.6 | ||||||
Nevins et al., 2013_I | 27 | 3.4 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 0.3 | 2.7 ± 0.4 | −0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.3 | −1.3 ± 0.3 | ||||||
Nygaard‐Østby et al., 2010 | 13 | >5 | 4.6 ± 1.8 | 2.2 ± 2.5 | 2.7 ± 1.8 | 0.6 ± 1.8 | |||||||
Orsini et al., 2008 | 12 | 3.7 ± 1.1 | 2.4 ± 1.1 | 4.2 ± 1.2 | 1.9 ± 1.3 | ||||||||
Grafting + BC | |||||||||||||
Menezes & Rao, 2012_II c | 60 | 3 – 5 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 5.4 ± 1.2 | 5.8 ± 0.5 | 0.4 ± 0.7 | −3.5 ± 0.8 | −4.5 ± 1.1 | |||||
Nevins et al., 2013_II d a | 28 | 4.3 ± 0.4 | 4.6 ± 0.3 | 3.4 ± 0.3 | −0.1 ± 0.3 | −0.5 ± 0.3 | −0.5 ± 0.3 | ||||||
Nevins et al., 2013_III d | 28 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.3 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.1 ± 0.4 | −0.3 ± 0.3 | ||||||
GTR | |||||||||||||
Crea et al., 2008 | 20 | 3 – 5 | 4.0 ± 0.9 | 2.1 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 1.1 | 1.2 ± 1.2 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 2.7 ± 1.2 | 0.4 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 1.6 | 0.2 ± 0.7 | ||
Eickholz et al., 2004_I a | 13 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | 2.4 ± 1.0 | 4.0 ± 1.4 | 1.6 ± 1.7 | 1.0 ± 1.6 | 1.0 ± 1.2 | 1.6 ± 1.1 | −0.1 ± 3.0 | ||||
Eickholz et al., 2004_II a | 13 | 3.7 ± 1.5 | 2.2 ± 1.8 | 3.6 ± 1.6 | 1.4 ± 1.7 | 1.6 ± 2.2 | 0.5 ± 1.7 | 1.2 ± 1.9 | −0.4 ± 3.0 | ||||
Kim et al., 2002_I a | 8 | 5.3 ± 1.9 | 1.6 ± 1.5 | 2.6 ± 2.0 | 1.0 ± 2.0 | ||||||||
Kim et al., 2002_II a | 8 | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 3.0 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 1.8 | 0.6 ± 1.8 | ||||||||
Mengel et al., 2006 | 22 | 4.1 ± 1.6 | 3.0 ± 2.0 | 3.6 ± 2.0 | 0.6 ± 1.4 | 0.6 ± 1.6 | 0.6 ± 2.0 | ||||||
Sculean et al., 2001 a | 12 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 2.9 ± 2.1 | 3.4 ± 1.6 | 0.5 ± 1.4 | 1.1 ± 1.1 | 0.3 ± 1.8 | ||||||
Sculean et al., 2004 a | 11 | 3.9 ± 1.4 | 2.7 ± 0.9 | 4.4 ± 1.4 | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 0.5 ± 1.5 | 0.5 ± 0.9 | ||||||
Nickles et al., 2009 | 10 | >5 | 4.5 ± 1.4 | 2.9 ± 2.2 | 4.2 ± 2.5 | 1.3 ± 1.8 | −0.2 ± 2.0 | 0.4 ± 1.2 | |||||
Petsos et al., 2019 | 10 | 4.9 ± 1.8 | 3.8 ± 2.7 | 4.8 ± 3.4 | 1.0 ± 2.1 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 0.30 ± 0.2 | ||||||
Pretzl et al., 2008_I a | 8 | 5.2 ± 1.9 | 1.5 ± 1.2 | 2.4 ± 1.6 | 0.7 ± 1.8 | −2.3 ± 1.6 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | ||||||
Pretzl et al., 2008_II a | 8 | 3.6 ± 1.0 | 3.5 ± 2.5 | 4.2 ± 2.5 | 0.7 ± 1.7 | −0.2 ± 1.8 | −0.2 ± 2.0 | ||||||
Pretzl et al., 2009_I a | 9 | 4.6 ± 2.5 | 2.4 ± 1.7 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 0.7 ± 2.3 | 3.5 ± 1.6 | 2.2 ± 2.0 | 1.7 ± 1.5 | 2.0 ± 2.6 | 1.6 ± 2.5 | −0.1 ± 1.8 | −0.2 ± 1.6 | |
Pretzl et al., 2009_II a | 9 | 4.3 ± 1.9 | 2.4 ± 1.8 | 3.2 ± 2.3 | 0.7 ± 1.8 | 3.7 ± 3.0 | 1.7 ± 2.8 | 1.2 ± 2.5 | 1.2 ± 2.1 | 1.4 ± 1.5 | 0.0 ± 2.5 | 0.5 ± 2.6 | |
Sculean et al., 2006 | 10 | 4.5 ± 0.8 | 2.9 ± 1.3 | 3.7 ± 0.9 | 0.8 ± 1.5 | 0.9 ± 0.7 | 0.1 ± 1.1 | ||||||
Sculean, Kiss, et al., 2008 | 10 | 5.0 ± 1.0 | 2.8 ± 1.2 | 3.4 ± 1.5 | 0.6 ± 1.4 | 0.8 ± 1.2 | 0.4 ± 1.2 | ||||||
Stavropoulos & Karring, 2010 | 12 | 5.8 ± 1.9 | 2.4 ± 2.1 | 3.0 ± 1.8 | 0.6 ± 2.0 | 1.7 ± 1.8 | 4.2 ± 2.0 | 3.6 ± 2.4 | 1.0 ± 1.7 | 0.6 ± 2.1 | −0.7 ± 2.1 | −0.4 ± 2.3 | |
Cortellini et al., 2017_Ia b | 13 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 5.2 ± 2.6 | 5.2 ± 2.6 | 0.1 ± 1.2 | 0.9 ± 0.9 | 0.1 ± 1.0 | ||||||
Cortellini et al., 2017_II b | 12 | 3.6 ± 1.0 | 3.6 ± 2.3 | 4.6 ± 2.3 | 1 ± 1.0 | 1.0 ± 0.8 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | ||||||
GTR + BC | |||||||||||||
Cetinkaya et al., 2014 c | 11 | 4.7 ± 0.8 | 2.4 ± 0.9 | 2.9 ± 0.9 | 0.5 ± 1.2 | 3.5 ± 2.1 | |||||||
EMD | |||||||||||||
Bhutda & Deo, 2013 | 15 | 3 – 5 | 3.4 ± 0.6 | 3.2 ± 0.9 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 0.7 ± 0.0 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | 3.2 ± 0.6 | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 0.8 ± 1.1 | |||
Crea et al., 2008 | 19 | 3.5 ± 0.8 | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 0.6 ± 1.2 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 2.7 ± 1.0 | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 0.4 ± 0.8 | −0.4 ± 0.8 | |||
Heijl et al., 1997 | 27 | 4.6 ± 1.0 | 2.2 ± 1.1 | 3.1 ± 1.0 | 2.6 ± 1.7 | ||||||||
Hoffmann et al., 2015 | 15 | 3.3 ± 1.9 | 3.8 ± 2.2 | 3.9 ± 2.3 | 0.1 ± 2.9 | −0.4 ± 1.8 | −1.8 ± 2.7 | ||||||
Ogihara & Tarnow, 2014 | 23 | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 1.3 | 3.1 ± 0.7 | −0.1 ± 0.8 | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 0.2 ± 0.5 | 0.0 ± 0.9 | 0.0 ± 0.8 | ||||
Pietruska et al., 2012 | 12 | 4.4 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 1.2 ± 0.9 | 0.3 ± 0.7 | 0.3 ± 1.1 | ||||||
Sculean et al., 2001 a | 12 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 3.0 ± 1.9 | 3.4 ± 1.6 | 0.4 ± 1.0 | 0.9 ± 1.2 | 0.4 ± 1.7 | ||||||
Sculean et al., 2004 a | 11 | 3.9 ± 1.5 | 2.9 ± 1.6 | 4.3 ± 1.7 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 0.3 ± 1.5 | 0.5 ± 1.4 | ||||||
Sculean, Pietruska, et al., 2007 | 13 | 4.4 ± 0.6 | 3.4 ± 1.4 | 4.2 ± 0.8 | 0.9 ± 1.1 | 0.5 ± 0.6 | 0.3 ± 1.0 | ||||||
Sculean et al., 2006 | 10 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 2.8 ± 1.4 | 3.4 ± 1.0 | 0.6 ± 1.0 | 0.7 ± 1.1 | 0.4 ± 1.5 | ||||||
Sculean, Kiss, et al., 2008 | 10 | 4.8 ± 1.1 | 2.9 ± 1.4 | 3.6 ± 1.7 | 0.7 ± 1.2 | 0.5 ± 1.2 | 0.5 ± 1.4 | ||||||
GTR + Grafting | |||||||||||||
Cetinkaya et al., 2014 | 11 | 3 – 5 | 4.1 ± 0.6 | 2.6 ± 1.1 | 3.5 ± 0.9 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 2.2 | ||||||
Gorski et al., 2020_I | 14 | 3.6 ± 1.3 | 4.8 ± 1.7 | 3.9 ± 1.2 | 0.7 ± 0.7 | 0.6 ± 0.5 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 0.3 ± 1.3 | −0.07 ± 1.3 | 0.06 ± 0.3 | 0.01 ± 0.3 | |
Gorski et al., 2020_II | 13 | 3.8 ± .1.0 | 4.0 ± 1.7 | 3.3 ± 1.7 | 0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 4.3 ± .1.6 | 4.4 ± 1.6 | 0.1 ± 1.6 | 0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.1 ± 0.4 | −0.07 ± 0.5 | |
Sculean, Schwarz, et al., 2007 | 10 | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 3.7 ± 1.1 | 4.8 ± 1.6 | 1.1 ± 1.2 | 0.6 ± 0.7 | 0.3 ± 0.6 | ||||||
Nygaard‐Østby et al., 2010 | 13 | >5 | 3.4 ± 1.1 | 3.8 ± 1.8 | 4.2 ± 1.8 | 0.7 ± 1.1 | |||||||
Orsini et al., 2008 | 12 | 4.4 ± 1.1 | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 3.3 ± 1.6 | 0.7 ± 1.2 | ||||||||
Stavropoulos & Karring, 2010_III a | 8 | 4.9 ± 1.3 | 2.3 ± 2.1 | 3.6 ± 1.2 | 1.3 ± 1.6 | 1.2 ± 2.2 | 3.8 ± 2.1 | 3.7 ± 2.4 | 0.3 ± 1.2 | 0.2 ± 2.3 | −1.4 ± 1.8 | −0.9 ± 2.1 | |
Stavropoulos & Karring, 2010_IV ¢ | 7 | 4.6 ± 1.2 | 4.1 ± 1.6 | 4.7 ± 1.2 | 0.6 ± 1.4 | 1.7 ± 2.4 | 3.9 ± 2.5 | 4.4 ± 2.4 | 0.4 ± 1.1 | 0.0 ± 1.7 | −0.4 ± 2.4 | −0.2 ± 2.3 | |
EMD + Grafting | |||||||||||||
Döri, Arweiler, Húszár, et al., 2013_I | 12 | 3 – 5 | 3.8 ± 1.3 | 4.3 ± 1.6 | 5.0 ± 1.8 | 0.7 ± 1.3 | 0.5 ± 1.2 | −0.3 ± 1.4 | |||||
Hoffmann et al., 2015 | 15 | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 4.1 ± 3.6 | 3.9 ± 2.0 | −0.2 ± 2.3 | −0.5 ± 1.7 | −2.0 ± 2.8 | ||||||
Ogihara & Tarnow, 2014_II e | 21 | 2.1 ± 0.4 | 4.2 ± 1.1 | 4.4 ± 0.9 | 0.3 ± 0.8 | 4.2 ± 2.4 | −0.1 ± 0.4 | 0.0 ± 0.7 | 0.0 ± 0.9 | ||||
Ogihara & Tarnow, 2014_III a , e | 23 | 2.7 ± 0.5 | 3.6 ± 1.2 | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 0.1 ± 0.8 | 4.3 ± 2.3 | 0.0 ± 0.5 | −0.1 ± 0.6 | 0.0 ± 0.9 | ||||
Pietruska et al., 2012 | 12 | 4.7 ± 0.8 | 3.2 ± 1.7 | 4.1 ± 1.3 | 0.9 ± 1.1 | 0.4 ± 0.9 | 0.2 ± 1.7 | ||||||
Sculean, Pietruska, et al., 2007 | 12 | 4.5 ± 1.0 | 3.4 ± 1.4 | 4.1 ± 1.0 | 0.7 ± 0.9 | 0.4 ± 1.0 | 0.2 ± 1.1 | ||||||
Döri, Arweiler, Szántó, et al., 2013_I a | 11 | >5 | 4.1 ± 0.9 | 3.1 ± 1.3 | 3.9 ± 1.1 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.5 ± 1.0 | |||||
Döri, Arweiler, Szántó, et al., 2013_II a | 11 | 4.1 ± 0.9 | 3.0 ± 1.5 | 4.0 ± 1.2 | 1.0 ± 0.7 | 0.8 ± 0.8 | 0.7 ± 1.3 | ||||||
EMD + GTR | |||||||||||||
Sculean et al., 2004 a | 10 | 3–5 | 4.4 ± 1.0 | 4.0 ± 1.0 | 2.6 ± 0.7 | 1.5 ± 0.7 | 0.4 ± 0.9 | 0.4 ± 0.9 | |||||
Sculean, Kiss, et al., 2008 | 9 | >5 | 5.1 ± 1.2 | 3.5 ± 1.4 | 2.9 ± 1.2 | 0.6 ± 1.1 | 1.0 ± 1.3 | 0.4 ± 1.2 | |||||
EMD + Grafting + BC | |||||||||||||
Döri, Arweiler, Húszár, et al., 2013_II c | 12 | 3 – 5 | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 4.3 ± 1.6 | 4.9 ± 1.5 | 0.6 ± 1.4 | 0.6 ± 1.1 | −0.4 ± 1.5 |
Changes regard comparisons with 1 year data.
Abbreviations: BC, blood‐derived growth factor constructs; CAL, clinical attachment level; CI, confidence interval; EMD, enamel matrix derivatives; GTR, guided tissue regeneration; Obs., observation; OFD, open flap debridement; PD, probing pocket depth; RBL, radiographic bone level; RDD, radiographic defect depth; REC, gingival recession.
Studies/groups not contributing with data in the network meta‐analyses.
Data recalculated to exclude patients that were re‐operated during the observation time.
Blood construct as adjunct;
Recombinant growth factor as adjunct;
Local antibiotic as adjunct.