Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 12;27(6):1250–1265. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15485

TABLE 2.

Random‐forest model performance predicting abundance or richness of wild bees. Response variables were z‐score normalized prior to analysis. The R‐squared, root mean squared error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE) were calculated using 10‐fold cross validation performed three times and are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Parameters mtry and ntree are the optimal values (for number of variables and number of trees, respectively) for each random‐forest model as determined by grid‐search parameter tuning

Wild‐bee taxa Season Response variable RMSE R 2 MAE mtry ntrees
All species Spring Abundance day−1 trap−1 0.89 ± 0.33 0.17 ± 0.10 0.59 ± 0.13 15 5000
Summer/fall 0.90 ± 0.32 0.13 ± 0.09 0.59 ± 0.09 25 1000
Spring Richness 0.88 ± 0.16 0.25 ± 0.17 0.67 ± 0.09 35 5000
Summer/fall 0.86 ± 0.08 0.27 ± 0.08 0.66 ± 0.05 35 2000
Andrena Spring Abundance day−1 trap−1 0.76 ± 0.56 0.28 ± 0.20 0.37 ± 0.14 35 2000
Nomada 0.93 ± 0.28 0.10 ± 0.10 0.59 ± 0.12 15 1000
Osmia 0.89 ± 0.28 0.21 ± 0.15 0.54 ± 0.11 15 5000
Cavity/stem nesters Summer/fall 0.85 ± 0.36 0.23 ± 0.15 0.45 ± 0.09 55 2000
Ground nesters 0.87 ± 0.40 0.17 ± 0.11 0.53 ± 0.10 50 3000
Eusocial species 0.89 ± 0.15 0.22 ± 0.10 0.57 ± 0.06 40 3000
Solitary species 0.89 ± 0.27 0.17 ± 0.08 0.51 ± 0.09 35 5000
Native species 0.90 ± 0.33 0.13 ± 0.08 0.57 ± 0.08 30 5000
Non‐native species 0.83 ± 0.40 0.23 ± 0.17 0.42 ± 0.09 55 3000