Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 22;22:145. doi: 10.1186/s12859-021-04064-0

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Impact of different properties of TRF scan and width of the area selection on the analysis by WALTER. (a) Influence of the scan size on the analysis. The full-size picture was 1644 × 1694 px, 1/4 size picture was 411 × 424 px. (b) Influence of the width of selected area of telomeric signal on the analysis. (c) Influence of the format of the file used for the analysis. Groups were compared by the “Overall visible spread” test (in the case of different widths, all groups were compared with the full width group). Every telomeric signal was measured 10 times and values were averaged. (Figure created using R 3.5.3)